• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

组织公正的涓滴模型:员工与顾客对公平的认知及反应之关联

A trickle-down model of organizational justice: relating employees' and customers' perceptions of and reactions to fairness.

作者信息

Masterson S S

机构信息

Department of Management, College of Business Administration, University of Cincinnati, Ohio 45221-0165, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2001 Aug;86(4):594-604. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.594.

DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.594
PMID:11519644
Abstract

This study developed and tested a trickle-down model of organizational justice that hypothesized that employees' perceptions of fairness should affect their attitudes toward the organization, subsequently influencing their behaviors toward customers. In turn, customers should interpret these behaviors as signals of fair treatment, causing them to react positively to both the employee and the organization. The model was tested on a sample of 187 instructors and their students. The results revealed that instructors who perceived high distributive and procedural justice reported higher organizational commitment. In turn, their students reported higher levels of instructor effort, prosocial behaviors, and fairness, as well as more positive reactions to the instructor. Overall, the results imply that fair treatment of employees has important organizational consequences because of customers' attitudes and future intentions toward key service employees.

摘要

本研究开发并测试了一种组织公正的涓滴模型,该模型假设员工对公平的认知会影响他们对组织的态度,进而影响他们对客户的行为。反过来,客户应将这些行为解读为公平对待的信号,从而对员工和组织都做出积极反应。该模型在187名教师及其学生的样本上进行了测试。结果显示,认为分配公正和程序公正程度高的教师表现出更高的组织承诺。相应地,他们的学生报告称教师付出的努力、亲社会行为和公平程度更高,对教师的反应也更积极。总体而言,结果表明,由于客户对关键服务员工的态度和未来意图,公平对待员工具有重要的组织影响。

相似文献

1
A trickle-down model of organizational justice: relating employees' and customers' perceptions of and reactions to fairness.组织公正的涓滴模型:员工与顾客对公平的认知及反应之关联
J Appl Psychol. 2001 Aug;86(4):594-604. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.594.
2
Perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance.员工药物检测的感知公平性作为员工态度和工作绩效的预测指标。
J Appl Psychol. 1991 Oct;76(5):698-707. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.76.5.698.
3
Event justice perceptions and employees' reactions: perceptions of social entity justice as a moderator.事件公平感认知与员工反应:社会实体公平感认知作为调节变量
J Appl Psychol. 2008 May;93(3):513-28. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.513.
4
A Longitudinal Study of the Predictors of Perceived Procedural Justice in Australian University Staff.澳大利亚大学教职工程序公正感预测因素的纵向研究
Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 25;7:1271. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01271. eCollection 2016.
5
What Factors Influence Employee Service Recovery Performance and What Are the Consequences in Health Care?哪些因素会影响员工的服务补救绩效,在医疗保健领域这些因素会带来怎样的后果?
Qual Manag Health Care. 2016 Jul-Sep;25(3):162-75. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000104.
6
When do procedural fairness and outcome fairness interact to influence employees' work attitudes and behaviors? The moderating effect of uncertainty.程序性公平和结果公平何时相互作用影响员工的工作态度和行为?不确定性的调节作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Mar;95(2):291-304. doi: 10.1037/a0017866.
7
Dimensionality of organizational justice in a call center context.呼叫中心环境下组织公正的维度。
Psychol Rep. 2012 Apr;110(2):677-93. doi: 10.2466/01.07.21.PR0.110.2.677-693.
8
Customer service providers' attitudes relating to customer service and customer satisfaction in the customer-server exchange.客户服务提供者在客户-服务人员互动中与客户服务及客户满意度相关的态度。
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Feb;88(1):179-87. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.179.
9
Just What I See? Implications of Congruence Between Supervisors' and Employees' Perceptions of Pay Justice for Employees' Work-Related Attitudes and Behaviors.我所看到的究竟是什么?主管与员工对薪酬公平性的认知一致性对员工工作相关态度和行为的影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 9;11:2069. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02069. eCollection 2020.
10
Associations of Changes in Organizational Justice with Job Attitudes and Health-Findings from a Prospective Study Using a Matching-Based Difference-in-Difference Approach.组织公正变化与工作态度和健康的关联——基于匹配差分法的前瞻性研究结果。
Int J Behav Med. 2020 Feb;27(1):119-135. doi: 10.1007/s12529-019-09841-z.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of perceived organizational fairness on the endogenous motivation of university teachers' professional development: A study of the mediating role of trust and organizational identification.感知组织公平对高校教师专业发展内生动机的影响:信任与组织认同的中介作用研究
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 16;20(1):e0317445. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317445. eCollection 2025.
2
Unveiling the impact of school organizational justice on students' professional commitment through academic stress mediation.揭示学校组织公正对学生专业承诺的影响,通过学业压力的中介作用。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 10;14(1):23704. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73174-5.
3
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Survey of Perceived Organizational Support.
《组织支持感知调查》日译本的信度和效度。
J Occup Health. 2024 Jan 4;66(1). doi: 10.1093/joccuh/uiae034.
4
How remote working increases the importance of positive leadership for employee vigor.远程工作如何提升积极领导对员工活力的重要性。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 20;14:1089557. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1089557. eCollection 2023.
5
An analysis of the trickle-down effect of supervisor knowledge hiding on subordinate knowledge hiding based on displaced aggression theory.基于替代性攻击理论对上级知识隐藏向下属知识隐藏的涓滴效应分析。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 21;13:1002277. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1002277. eCollection 2022.
6
A Literature Review of Social and Economic Leader-Member Exchange.社会与经济领导-成员交换的文献综述
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 8;11:1474. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01474. eCollection 2020.
7
Supervision Incivility and Employee Psychological Safety in the Workplace.工作场所中的监督不文明行为与员工心理安全感
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 29;17(3):840. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030840.
8
What Drives the Trickle-Down Effect of Calling Orientation From Supervisors to Subordinates? The Perspective of Social Learning Theory.是什么推动了呼叫取向从上级向下属的涓滴效应?社会学习理论的视角。
Front Psychol. 2019 May 9;10:905. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00905. eCollection 2019.
9
A comparison of decision-making by physicians and administrators in healthcare settings.医疗环境中医师与管理人员决策方式的比较。
Crit Care. 2006;10(5):163. doi: 10.1186/cc5028.