Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚大学教职工程序公正感预测因素的纵向研究

A Longitudinal Study of the Predictors of Perceived Procedural Justice in Australian University Staff.

作者信息

Pignata Silvia, Winefield Anthony H, Provis Chris, Boyd Carolyn M

机构信息

School of Engineering, University of South AustraliaAdelaide, SA, Australia; Asia Pacific Centre of Work Health and Safety, School of Psychology, Social Work and Social Policy, University of South AustraliaAdelaide, SA, Australia.

Asia Pacific Centre of Work Health and Safety, School of Psychology, Social Work and Social Policy, University of South AustraliaAdelaide, SA, Australia; School of Psychology, University of AdelaideAdelaide, SA, Australia.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 25;7:1271. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01271. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study examined the factors that predict employees' perceptions of procedural justice in university settings. The paper also reviews the ethical aspects of justice and psychological contracts within employment relationships.

DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The study examined the predictors of perceived procedural justice in a two-wave longitudinal sample of 945 employees from 13 universities by applying the Job Demands-Resources theoretical model of stress. The proposed predictors were classified into two categories: Job demands of work pressure and work-home conflict; and job resources of job security, autonomy, trust in senior management, and trust in supervisor. The predictor model also examined job satisfaction and affective organizational commitment, demographic (age, gender, tenure, role) and individual characteristics (negative affectivity, job involvement) as well as Time 1 (T1) perceptions of procedural justice to ensure that tests were rigorous.

FINDINGS

A series of hierarchical multiple regression analyses found that job satisfaction at T1 was the strongest predictor of perceived procedural justice at Time 2. Employees' trust in senior management, and their length of tenure also positively predicted justice perceptions. There were also differences between academic and non-academic staff groups, as non-academic employees' level of job satisfaction, trust in senior management, and their length of organizational tenure predicted procedural justice perceptions, whereas for academics, only job satisfaction predicted perceived justice. For the "all staff" category, job satisfaction was a dominant and enduring predictor of justice, and employees' trust in senior management also predicted justice.

RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Results highlight the importance of workplace factors in enhancing fair procedures to encourage reciprocity from employees. As perceived procedural justice is also conceptually linked to the psychological contract between employees-employers, it is possible that employees' levels of job satisfaction and perceptions of trust in senior management, relative to other work attitudinal outcomes, may be more effective for improving the broader working environment, and promoting staff morale.

ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This study adds to research on applied business ethics as it focuses on the ethical aspects of perceived procedural justice and highlights the importance of workplace factors in enhancing fair procedures in organizational policy to encourage reciprocity and promote healthy organizational environments.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨了预测大学环境中员工对程序公正看法的因素。本文还回顾了就业关系中公正和心理契约的伦理层面。

设计/方法/途径:该研究通过应用工作需求-资源压力理论模型,对来自13所大学的945名员工的两波纵向样本进行了研究,以考察感知到的程序公正的预测因素。提出的预测因素分为两类:工作压力和工作-家庭冲突的工作需求;以及工作保障、自主权、对高级管理层的信任和对主管的信任等工作资源。预测模型还考察了工作满意度和情感组织承诺、人口统计学因素(年龄、性别、任期、角色)以及个人特征(消极情感、工作投入),以及时间1(T1)对程序公正的看法,以确保测试的严谨性。

研究结果

一系列分层多元回归分析发现,T1时的工作满意度是T2时感知到的程序公正的最强预测因素。员工对高级管理层的信任以及他们的任期长度也对公正看法有正向预测作用。学术人员和非学术人员群体之间也存在差异,非学术员工的工作满意度水平、对高级管理层的信任以及他们在组织中的任期长度预测了程序公正看法,而对于学术人员来说,只有工作满意度预测了感知到的公正。对于“全体员工”类别,工作满意度是公正的主导和持久预测因素,员工对高级管理层的信任也预测了公正。

研究局限性/启示:结果凸显了工作场所因素在加强公平程序以鼓励员工互惠方面的重要性。由于感知到的程序公正从概念上讲也与员工-雇主之间的心理契约相关联,相对于其他工作态度结果,员工的工作满意度水平和对高级管理层的信任看法可能在改善更广泛的工作环境和提高员工士气方面更有效。

原创性/价值:本研究通过关注感知到的程序公正的伦理层面,并强调工作场所因素在加强组织政策中的公平程序以鼓励互惠和促进健康组织环境方面的重要性,为应用商业伦理研究增添了内容。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b885/4997092/8aaa7330635d/fpsyg-07-01271-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验