Yamagishi N, Melara R D
Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-1364, USA.
Percept Psychophys. 2001 Jul;63(5):824-46. doi: 10.3758/bf03194441.
Three experiments were conducted to examine the distinct contributions of two visual dimensions to figure-ground segregation. In each experiment, pattern identification was assessed by asking observers to judge whether a near-threshold test pattern was the same or different in shape to a high-contrast comparison pattern. A test pattern could differ from its background along one dimension, either luminance (luminance tasks) or chromaticity (chromaticity tasks). In each task, performance in a baseline condition, in which the test pattern was intact, was compared with performance in each of several degradation conditions, in which either the contour or the surface of the figure was degraded, using either partial occlusion (Experiment 1) or ramping (Experiments 2 and 3) of figure-ground differences. In each experiment, performance in luminance tasks was worst when the contour was degraded, whereas performance in chromaticity tasks was worst when the surface was degraded. This interaction was found even when spatial frequencies were fixed across test patterns by low-pass filtering. The results are consistent with a late (postfiltering) dual-mechanism system that processes luminance information to extract boundary representations and chromaticity information to extract surface representations.
进行了三项实验,以检验两个视觉维度对图形-背景分离的不同贡献。在每项实验中,通过要求观察者判断一个接近阈值的测试图案与一个高对比度比较图案的形状是否相同来评估图案识别。测试图案可以在一个维度上与其背景不同,要么是亮度(亮度任务),要么是色度(色度任务)。在每项任务中,将测试图案完整的基线条件下的表现与几种退化条件下的表现进行比较,在这些退化条件下,图形的轮廓或表面使用图形-背景差异的部分遮挡(实验1)或渐变(实验2和3)进行了退化。在每项实验中,当轮廓退化时,亮度任务的表现最差,而当表面退化时,色度任务的表现最差。即使通过低通滤波在测试图案之间固定空间频率,也发现了这种相互作用。结果与一个后期(滤波后)双机制系统一致,该系统处理亮度信息以提取边界表示,处理色度信息以提取表面表示。