Suppr超能文献

孕期胰岛素敏感性的临床实用评估:糖耐量正常及妊娠期糖尿病女性的验证研究

Clinically useful estimates of insulin sensitivity during pregnancy: validation studies in women with normal glucose tolerance and gestational diabetes mellitus.

作者信息

Kirwan J P, Huston-Presley L, Kalhan S C, Catalano P M

机构信息

Department of Reproductive Biology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine at MetroHealth Medical Center, Bell Greve Building, 2500 MetroHealth Dr., Cleveland, OH 44109-1998, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2001 Sep;24(9):1602-7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.9.1602.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We examined whether selected indexes of insulin sensitivity derived from an oral glucose tolerance test (IS(OGTT)) or fasting glucose/insulin levels (IS(QUICKI) and IS(HOMA)) can be used to predict insulin sensitivity in women before and during pregnancy.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A 2-h euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp (5 mmol/l glucose, 40 mU. m(-2). min(-1) insulin) and a 120-min oral glucose tolerance test (75 g load pregravid, 100 g pregnant) were repeated on 15 women (10 with normal glucose tolerance [NGT] and 5 with gestational diabetes mellitus [GDM]) pregravid and during both early (12-14 weeks) and late (34-36 weeks) pregnancy. An index of insulin sensitivity derived from the clamp (IS(CLAMP)) was obtained from glucose infusion rates adjusted for change in fat-free mass and endogenous glucose production measured using [6,6(-2)H(2)]glucose.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis using combined groups and periods of pregnancy resulted in significant correlations between IS(CLAMP) and IS(OGTT) (r(2) = 0.74, P < 0.0001), IS(QUICKI) (r(2) = 0.64, P < 0.0001), and IS(HOMA) (r(2) = 0.53, P < 0.0001). The IS(OGTT) provided a significantly better correlation (P < 0.0001) than either IS(QUICKI) or IS(HOMA.) Multivariate analysis showed a significant group effect (P < 0.0003) on the prediction model, and separate equations were developed for the NGT (r(2) = 0.64, P < 0.0001) and GDM (r(2) = 0.85, P < 0.0001) groups. When subdivided by period of pregnancy, the correlation between IS(CLAMP) and IS(OGTT) pregravid was r(2) = 0.63 (P = 0.0002), during early pregnancy was r(2) = 0.80 (P < 0.0001), and during late pregnancy was r(2) = 0.64 (P = 0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

Estimates of insulin sensitivity from the IS(OGTT) during pregnancy were significantly better than from fasting glucose and insulin values. However, separate prediction equations are necessary for pregnant women with NGT and women with GDM.

摘要

目的

我们研究了源自口服葡萄糖耐量试验(IS(OGTT))或空腹血糖/胰岛素水平(IS(QUICKI)和IS(HOMA))的胰岛素敏感性选定指标是否可用于预测女性孕前及孕期的胰岛素敏感性。

研究设计与方法

对15名女性(10名糖耐量正常[NGT],5名患有妊娠期糖尿病[GDM])在孕前、孕早期(12 - 14周)和孕晚期(34 - 36周)重复进行2小时正常血糖高胰岛素钳夹试验(5 mmol/l葡萄糖,40 mU·m⁻²·min⁻¹胰岛素)和120分钟口服葡萄糖耐量试验(孕前75 g负荷,孕期100 g负荷)。从钳夹试验获得的胰岛素敏感性指标(IS(CLAMP))通过根据无脂肪体重变化和使用[6,6(-2)H₂]葡萄糖测量的内源性葡萄糖生成进行调整的葡萄糖输注率得出。

结果

对合并的孕期组进行单因素分析,结果显示IS(CLAMP)与IS(OGTT)(r² = 0.74,P < 0.0001)、IS(QUICKI)(r² = 0.64,P < 0.0001)和IS(HOMA)(r² = 0.53,P < 0.0001)之间存在显著相关性。IS(OGTT)的相关性显著优于IS(QUICKI)或IS(HOMA)(P < 0.0001)。多因素分析显示预测模型存在显著的组效应(P < 0.0003),并为NGT组(r² = 0.64,P < 0.0001)和GDM组(r² = 0.85,P < 0.0001)分别建立了方程。按孕期细分时,孕前IS(CLAMP)与IS(OGTT)的相关性为r² = 0.63(P = 0.0002),孕早期为r² = 0.80(P < 0.0001),孕晚期为r² = 0.64(P = 0.0002)。

结论

孕期通过IS(OGTT)评估的胰岛素敏感性明显优于通过空腹血糖和胰岛素值评估的结果。然而,对于NGT孕妇和GDM孕妇需要分别建立预测方程。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验