McKinley W O, Seel R T, Gadi R K, Tewksbury M A
Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond 23298, USA.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Sep;80(9):693-9; quiz 700, 716. doi: 10.1097/00002060-200109000-00010.
Nontraumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) represents a significant proportion of individuals admitted for SCI rehabilitation; however, there is limited literature regarding their outcomes. As our society continues to age and nontraumatic injuries present with greater frequency, further studies in this area will become increasingly relevant. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes of patients with nontraumatic SCI with those with traumatic SCI after inpatient rehabilitation.
A longitudinal study with matched block design was used comparing 86 patients with nontraumatic SCI admitted to a SCI rehabilitation unit and 86 patients with traumatic SCI admitted to regional model SCI centers, controlling for age, neurologic level of injury, and American Spinal Injury Association impairment classification. Main outcome measures included acute and rehabilitation hospital length of stay, FIM scores, FIM change, FIM efficiency, rehabilitation charges, and discharge-to-home rates.
Results indicate that when compared with traumatic SCI, patients with nontraumatic SCI had a significantly (P < 0.01) shorter rehabilitation length of stay (22.38 vs. 41.35 days) and lower discharge FIM scores (57.3 vs. 65.6), FIM change (18.6 vs. 31.0), and rehabilitation charges ($25,050 vs. $64,570). No statistical differences were found in acute care length of stay, admission FIM scores, FIM efficiency, and community discharge rates.
The findings indicate that patients with nontraumatic SCI can achieve rates of functional gains and community discharge comparable with traumatic SCI. Whereas patients with traumatic SCI achieved greater overall functional improvement, patients with nontraumatic SCI had shorter rehabilitation length of stay and lower rehabilitation charges. These findings have important implications for the interdisciplinary rehabilitation process in the overall management and outcome of individuals with nontraumatic SCI.
非创伤性脊髓损伤(SCI)患者占因脊髓损伤入院接受康复治疗患者的相当比例;然而,关于其治疗结果的文献有限。随着社会持续老龄化以及非创伤性损伤出现的频率增加,该领域的进一步研究将变得愈发重要。本研究的目的是比较住院康复后非创伤性脊髓损伤患者与创伤性脊髓损伤患者的治疗结果。
采用纵向匹配区组设计研究,比较86例入住脊髓损伤康复单元的非创伤性脊髓损伤患者和86例入住区域脊髓损伤模型中心的创伤性脊髓损伤患者,控制年龄、神经损伤水平和美国脊髓损伤协会损伤分级。主要结局指标包括急性住院和康复住院时间、功能独立性评定(FIM)评分、FIM变化、FIM效率、康复费用以及出院回家率。
结果表明,与创伤性脊髓损伤患者相比,非创伤性脊髓损伤患者的康复住院时间显著缩短(22.38天对41.35天,P<0.01),出院时FIM评分更低(57.3对65.6)、FIM变化更小(18.6对31.0)以及康复费用更低(25,050美元对64,570美元)。在急性护理住院时间、入院FIM评分、FIM效率和社区出院率方面未发现统计学差异。
研究结果表明,非创伤性脊髓损伤患者能够获得与创伤性脊髓损伤患者相当的功能改善率和社区出院率。虽然创伤性脊髓损伤患者总体功能改善更大,但非创伤性脊髓损伤患者的康复住院时间更短且康复费用更低。这些发现对非创伤性脊髓损伤患者的整体管理和治疗结果的多学科康复过程具有重要意义。