Suppr超能文献

[儿童与青少年精神病学中的评估治疗方法 I]

[Evaluated treatment approaches in child and adolescent psychiatry I].

作者信息

Baving L, Schmidt M H

机构信息

Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg.

出版信息

Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2001 Aug;29(3):189-205. doi: 10.1024//1422-4917.29.3.189.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The principle of evidence-based medicine is to integrate data concerning the efficacy of interventions into clinical practice. This article assesses the level of evaluation of psychosocial, psychopharmacological and combined interventions for mental disorders in childhood and adolescence (autistic disorders, hyperkinetic disorders, conduct disorders, tic disorders, enuresis, and encopresis).

METHODS

Three different levels of evaluation were defined for both psychosocial and psychopharmacological interventions: A (> or = 2 randomized controlled studies), B (1 randomized controlled study), and C (open studies and case studies). The level of evaluation was judged on the basis of original papers found in a comprehensive literature search.

RESULTS

For most disorders presented in this article there are several A-level treatments. The efficacy of both psychosocial and psychopharmacological interventions that target specific problem behaviors or symptoms, respectively, has been repeatedly demonstrated with regard to autistic disorders. Many studies have evaluated treatment approaches for hyperkinetic disorders and conduct disorders. With regard to the treatment of tic disorders in children and adolescents, far more studies evaluated the efficacy of pharmacotherapy than of psychotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Further research should compare the efficacy of different treatment approaches, examine specific and differential treatment effects and investigate combined treatment approaches.

摘要

目的

循证医学的原则是将有关干预措施疗效的数据整合到临床实践中。本文评估了针对儿童和青少年精神障碍(自闭症谱系障碍、多动障碍、品行障碍、抽动障碍、遗尿症和遗粪症)的心理社会干预、心理药物干预及联合干预的评估水平。

方法

为心理社会干预和心理药物干预定义了三种不同的评估水平:A(≥2项随机对照研究)、B(1项随机对照研究)和C(开放研究和病例研究)。评估水平是根据在全面文献检索中找到的原始论文来判断的。

结果

对于本文中呈现的大多数障碍,都有几种A级治疗方法。分别针对特定问题行为或症状的心理社会干预和心理药物干预的疗效,在自闭症谱系障碍方面已得到反复证实。许多研究评估了多动障碍和品行障碍的治疗方法。关于儿童和青少年抽动障碍的治疗,评估药物治疗疗效的研究远比评估心理治疗疗效的研究多。

结论

进一步的研究应比较不同治疗方法的疗效,研究特定和差异治疗效果,并探讨联合治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验