Wendtner C, Abdel-Rahman S, Baumert J, Falk M H, Krych M, Santl M, Hiddemann W, Issels R D
Department of Internal Medicine III, Klinikum Grosshadern Medical Center (KGMC), Ludwig-Maximilians-University, D-81377, Munich, Germany.
Eur J Cancer. 2001 Sep;37(13):1609-16. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(01)00191-5.
The efficacy of thermochemotherapy in adult patients with primary, recurrent or inadequately resected non-metastatic high-risk soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) was assessed. 54 patients were prospectively treated with four cycles of etoposide, ifosfamide and doxorubicin (EIA) combined with regional hyperthermia (RHT) followed by surgery, another four cycles of EIA without RHT and external beam radiation. The objective response rate was 16% and at a median follow-up time of 57 months, the 4-year estimated rates of local failure-free survival (LFFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 59% (95% confidence interval (CI) 45-73%), 59% (95% CI 44-73%), 26% (95% CI 14-38%) and 40% (95% CI 27-53%), respectively. OS was in favour of patients responding to neoadjuvant treatment (P=0.073). In comparison to a preceding phase II study including pre- and postsurgical thermochemotherapy (RHT-91), at a 4-year follow-up the RHT-95 study cohort showed an inferior LFFS rate (P=0.027), but this did not affect DMFS (P=0.558) or OS (P=0.126). Hence, postsurgical thermochemotherapy seems critical for local tumour control without affecting survival.
评估了热化疗对原发性、复发性或切除不充分的非转移性高危软组织肉瘤(STS)成年患者的疗效。54例患者接受了四个周期的依托泊苷、异环磷酰胺和阿霉素(EIA)联合区域热疗(RHT),随后进行手术,另外四个周期的EIA不联合RHT及外照射。客观缓解率为16%,中位随访时间为57个月,4年局部无复发生存率(LFFS)、远处无转移生存率(DMFS)、无事件生存率(EFS)和总生存率(OS)估计分别为59%(95%置信区间(CI)45-73%)、59%(95%CI 44-73%)、26%(95%CI 14-38%)和40%(95%CI 27-53%)。OS有利于对新辅助治疗有反应的患者(P=0.073)。与之前一项包括手术前后热化疗的II期研究(RHT-91)相比,在4年随访时,RHT-95研究队列的LFFS率较低(P=0.027),但这并不影响DMFS(P=0.558)或OS(P=0.126)。因此,术后热化疗似乎对局部肿瘤控制至关重要且不影响生存率。