Lehnhardt Marcus, Muehlberger Thomas, Kuhnen Cornelius, Brett Daniel, Steinau Hans U, Jafari Hamid Joneidi, Steinstraesser Lars, Müller Oliver, Homann Heinz H
Department of Plastic Surgery, Burn Center, Hand surgery, Sarcoma Reference Center, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Ruhr University Bochum, Bürkle-de-la Camp Platz 1, 44789 Bochum, Germany.
World J Surg Oncol. 2005 Apr 18;3(1):20. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-3-20.
Soft tissue sarcomas comprise less than 1% of all solid malignancies. The presentation and behavior of these tumors differs depending on location and histological characteristics. Standard therapy consists of complete surgical resection in combination with adjuvant radiotherapy. The role of chemotherapy is not clearly defined and is largely restricted to clinical trials. Only a limited number of agents have proved to be effective in soft tissue sarcomas. The use of doxorubicin, epirubicin and ifosfamide allowed response rates of more than 20%. In addition, recent chemotherapy trials did not demonstrate any significant differences in efficacy for various histological subtypes. METHODS: The objective of this study was to gain additional information about the chemosensitivity of soft tissue sarcomas to seven 7 different chemotherapy agents as single drugs and 4 combinations. Therefore we used an established ATP based in-vitro testing system and examined 50 soft tissue sarcomas. Chemosensitivity was assessed using a luciferin-luciferase-based luminescence assay providing individual chemosensitivity indices for each agent tested. RESULTS: The sensitivity varied widely according to the histological subtypes. The tumors state of cellular dedifferentiation played a crucial role for the efficiency of the chemotherapeutic agents. The sensitivity also depended on the presentation of the sarcoma as a primary or recurrent tumor. The highest sensitivity was demonstrated for actinomycin D as a single agent, with 74% of the tumor samples exhibiting a high-grade sensitivity (20% low sensitivity, no resistance). The combination of actinomycin D and ifosfamide yielded a high sensitivity in 76% (2% resistance). Doxorubicin as a mono-therapy or in combination with ifosfamide achieved high sensitivity in 70% and 72%, respectively, and resistance in 6% of the samples. CONCLUSION: Chemosensitivity testing is feasible in soft tissue sarcomas. It can be used to create sensitivity and resistance profiles of established and new cytotoxic agents and their combinations in soft tissue sarcomas. Our data demonstrate measurable discrepancies of the drug efficiency in soft tissue sarcomas, sarcoma subtypes and tumor recurrencies. However, current therapeutic regime does not take this in consideration, yet.
软组织肉瘤占所有实体恶性肿瘤的比例不到1%。这些肿瘤的表现和行为因位置和组织学特征而异。标准治疗包括完整的手术切除并联合辅助放疗。化疗的作用尚不明确,主要限于临床试验。只有少数药物被证明对软组织肉瘤有效。使用阿霉素、表柔比星和异环磷酰胺可使缓解率超过20%。此外,最近的化疗试验并未显示出各种组织学亚型在疗效上有任何显著差异。
本研究的目的是获取关于软组织肉瘤对7种不同化疗药物单药及4种联合用药的化疗敏感性的更多信息。因此,我们使用了一种成熟的基于ATP的体外检测系统,检测了50例软组织肉瘤。使用基于荧光素-荧光素酶的发光测定法评估化疗敏感性,为每种测试药物提供个体化疗敏感性指数。
敏感性因组织学亚型而异。肿瘤细胞去分化状态对化疗药物的疗效起关键作用。敏感性还取决于肉瘤是原发性还是复发性肿瘤。放线菌素D作为单药显示出最高敏感性,74%的肿瘤样本表现出高敏性(20%低敏性,无耐药性)。放线菌素D与异环磷酰胺联合使用时,76%的样本显示高敏性(2%耐药)。阿霉素单药治疗或与异环磷酰胺联合使用时,分别有70%和72%的样本达到高敏性,6%的样本耐药。
化疗敏感性检测在软组织肉瘤中是可行的。它可用于建立软组织肉瘤中已有的和新的细胞毒性药物及其联合用药的敏感性和耐药性图谱。我们的数据表明软组织肉瘤、肉瘤亚型和肿瘤复发情况在药物疗效上存在可测量的差异。然而,目前的治疗方案尚未考虑到这一点。