Suppr超能文献

使用超声处理和索氏提取法从黏土中提取老化多环芳烃(PAH)残留物的比较研究

The extraction of aged polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) residues from a clay soil using sonication and a Soxhlet procedure: a comparative study.

作者信息

Guerin T F

出版信息

J Environ Monit. 1999 Feb;1(1):63-7. doi: 10.1039/a807307d.

Abstract

A sonication method was compared with Soxhlet extraction for recovering polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) from a clay soil that had been contaminated with tar materials for several decades. Using sonication over an 8 h extraction period, maximum extraction of the 16 US EPA priority PAH was obtained with dichloromethane (DCM)-acetone (1 + 1). The same procedure using hexane-acetone (1 + 1) recovered 86% of that obtained using DCM-acetone (1 + 1). PAH recovery was dependent on time of extraction up to a period of 8 h. The sonication procedure showed that individual PAH are extracted at differing rates depending on the number of fused rings in the molecule. Soxhlet extraction [with DCM-acetone (1 + 1)] over an 8 h period recovered 95% of the PAH removed by the sonication procedure using DCM-acetone (1 + 1), indicating that rigorous sonication can achieve PAH recoveries similar to those obtained by Soxhlet extraction. The lower recovery with the Soxhlet extraction was explained by the observed losses of the volatile PAH components after 1-4 h of extraction. The type of solvent used, the length of time of extraction and extraction method influenced the quantification of PAH in the soil. Therefore, the study has implications for PAH analyses in soils and sediments, and particularly for contaminated site assessments where the data from commercial laboratories are being used. The study emphasizes the importance of establishing (and being consistent in the application of) a vigorous extraction, particularly for commercial laboratories that handle samples of soil in batches (at different times) from a single site investigation or remediation process. The strong binding of PAH to soil, forming aged residues, has significant implications for extraction efficiency. This paper illustrates the problem of the underestimation of PAH using the US EPA method 3550, specifically where a surrogate spike is routinely employed and the efficiency of the extraction procedure for aged residues is unknown. The implications of this study for environmental monitoring, particularly where numerous batches of samples from a single site assessment or remediation program are submitted to commercial laboratories, is that it would be advisable for these laboratories to check their existing method's extraction efficiencies by conducting a time course sonication extraction on their particular soil to determine the optimum extraction time.

摘要

将一种超声处理方法与索氏提取法进行了比较,以从被焦油材料污染数十年的粘土土壤中回收多环芳烃(PAH)。在8小时的提取时间内使用超声处理,用二氯甲烷(DCM)-丙酮(1+1)可获得16种美国环保署优先PAH的最大提取量。使用己烷-丙酮(1+1)的相同程序回收量为使用DCM-丙酮(1+1)时的86%。PAH的回收率在长达8小时的提取时间内取决于提取时间。超声处理程序表明,单个PAH的提取速率取决于分子中稠环的数量。在8小时内进行索氏提取[使用DCM-丙酮(1+1)]回收了超声处理程序使用DCM-丙酮(1+1)去除的PAH的95%,这表明严格的超声处理可以实现与索氏提取相似的PAH回收率。索氏提取回收率较低的原因是观察到在提取1-4小时后挥发性PAH成分有所损失。所用溶剂的类型、提取时间长度和提取方法会影响土壤中PAH的定量。因此,该研究对土壤和沉积物中PAH的分析具有启示意义,特别是对于使用商业实验室数据的污染场地评估。该研究强调了建立(并在应用中保持一致)有力提取方法的重要性,特别是对于从单个场地调查或修复过程中批量(在不同时间)处理土壤样品的商业实验室。PAH与土壤的强结合形成老化残留物,对提取效率有重大影响。本文说明了使用美国环保署方法3550低估PAH的问题,特别是在常规使用替代加标且老化残留物提取程序效率未知的情况下。该研究对环境监测的启示,特别是在将来自单个场地评估或修复计划的大量批次样品提交给商业实验室的情况下,是这些实验室通过对其特定土壤进行时间进程超声提取以确定最佳提取时间来检查其现有方法的提取效率是可取的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验