Finello Karen Moran, Terteryan Araksi, Riewerts Robert J
WestEd Center for Prevention & Early Intervention, Sacramento, CA; University of Southern California Emeriti Center, Los Angeles, CA.
WestEd Center for Prevention & Early Intervention, Sacramento, CA.
Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2016 Apr;46(4):101-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2015.12.011. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
Responsibilities for primary care clinicians are rapidly expanding ascomplexities in families' lives create increased disparities in health and developmental outcomes for young children. Despite the demands on primary care clinicians to promote health in the context of complex family and community factors, most primary care clinicians are operating in an environment of limited training and a shortage of resources for supporting families. Partnerships with evidence-based home visiting programs for very young children and their families can provide a resource that will help to reduce the impact of adverse early childhood experiences and facilitate health equity. Home visiting programs in the United States are typically voluntary and designed to be preventative in nature, although families are usually offered services based on significant risk criteria since the costs associated with universal approaches have been considered prohibitive. Programs may be funded within the health (physical orbehavioral/mental health), child welfare, early education, or early intervention systems or by private foundation dollars focused primarily on oneof the above systems (e.g., health), with a wide range of outcomes targeted by the programs and funders. Services may be primarily focused on the child, the parent, or parent-child interactions. Services include the development of targeted and individualized intervention strategies, better coaching of parents, and improved modeling of interactions that may assist struggling families. This paper provides a broad overview ofthe history of home visiting, theoretical bases of home visiting programs, key components of evidence-based models, outcomes typically targeted, research on effectiveness, cost information, challenges and benefits of home visiting, and funding/sustainability concerns. Significance for primary care clinicians isdescribed specifically and information relevant for clinicians is emphasized throughout the paper.
随着家庭生活复杂性导致幼儿健康和发育结果的差距不断扩大,初级保健临床医生的职责正在迅速扩展。尽管在复杂的家庭和社区因素背景下,初级保健临床医生面临着促进健康的要求,但大多数初级保健临床医生所处的培训有限且支持家庭的资源短缺的环境中。与针对幼儿及其家庭的循证家访项目建立伙伴关系,可以提供一种资源,有助于减少幼儿早期不良经历的影响,并促进健康公平。美国的家访项目通常是自愿的,旨在预防为主,尽管家庭通常是根据重大风险标准获得服务,因为普遍方法的相关成本被认为过高。这些项目可能由卫生(身体或行为/心理健康)、儿童福利、早期教育或早期干预系统提供资金,或者由主要专注于上述系统之一(如卫生)的私人基金会资金提供,项目和资助者的目标结果范围广泛。服务可能主要侧重于儿童、家长或亲子互动。服务包括制定有针对性的个性化干预策略、更好地指导家长以及改善互动模式,以帮助陷入困境的家庭。本文广泛概述了家访的历史、家访项目的理论基础、循证模式的关键组成部分、通常针对的结果、有效性研究、成本信息、家访的挑战和益处以及资金/可持续性问题。文中特别阐述了对初级保健临床医生的重要性,并在整篇文章中强调了与临床医生相关的信息。