Suppr超能文献

尿激酶催化的尿激酶受体裂解需要完整的糖脂锚。

Urokinase-catalysed cleavage of the urokinase receptor requires an intact glycolipid anchor.

作者信息

Høyer-Hansen G, Pessara U, Holm A, Pass J, Weidle U, Danø K, Behrendt N

机构信息

Finsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.

出版信息

Biochem J. 2001 Sep 15;358(Pt 3):673-9. doi: 10.1042/0264-6021:3580673.

Abstract

Urokinase (uPA) has the striking ability to cleave its receptor, uPAR, thereby inactivating the binding potential of this molecule. Here we demonstrate that the glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor of uPAR, which is attached to the third domain, is an important determinant in governing this reaction, even though the actual cleavage occurs between the first and second domains. Purified full-length GPI-anchored uPAR (GPI-uPAR) proved much more susceptible to uPA-mediated cleavage than recombinant truncated soluble uPAR (suPAR), which lacks the glycolipid anchor. This was not a general difference in proteolytic susceptibility since GPI-uPAR and suPAR were cleaved with equal efficiency by plasmin. Since the amino acid sequences of GPI-uPAR and suPAR are identical except for the C-terminal truncation, the different cleavage patterns suggest that the two uPAR variants differ in the conformation or the flexibility of the linker region between domains 1 and 2. This was supported by the fact that an antibody to the peptide AVTYSRSRYLE, amino acids 84-94 in the linker region, recognizes GPI-uPAR but not suPAR. This difference in the linker region is thus caused by a difference in a remote hydrophobic region. In accordance with this model, when the hydrophobic lipid moiety was removed from the glycolipid anchor by phospholipase C, low concentrations of uPA could no longer cleave the modified GPI-uPAR and the reactivity to the peptide antibody was greatly decreased. Naturally occurring suPAR, purified from plasma, was found to have a similar resistance to uPA cleavage as phospholipase C-treated GPI-uPAR and recombinant suPAR.

摘要

尿激酶(uPA)具有显著的能力来裂解其受体uPAR,从而使该分子的结合潜能失活。在此我们证明,附着于第三结构域的uPAR的糖基磷脂酰肌醇(GPI)锚是控制此反应的一个重要决定因素,尽管实际裂解发生在第一和第二结构域之间。纯化的全长GPI锚定的uPAR(GPI - uPAR)比缺乏糖脂锚的重组截短可溶性uPAR(suPAR)对uPA介导的裂解更敏感。这不是蛋白水解敏感性的普遍差异,因为GPI - uPAR和suPAR被纤溶酶以相同效率裂解。由于GPI - uPAR和suPAR的氨基酸序列除了C末端截短外是相同的,不同的裂解模式表明这两种uPAR变体在结构域1和2之间连接区的构象或灵活性上有所不同。这一观点得到以下事实的支持:针对连接区氨基酸84 - 94的肽AVTYSRSRYLE的抗体可识别GPI - uPAR而不识别suPAR。因此,连接区的这种差异是由一个遥远的疏水区域的差异引起的。根据这一模型,当通过磷脂酶C从糖脂锚中去除疏水脂质部分时,低浓度的uPA不再能够裂解修饰后的GPI - uPAR,并且对肽抗体的反应性大大降低。从血浆中纯化的天然存在的suPAR被发现对uPA裂解具有与磷脂酶C处理的GPI - uPAR和重组suPAR相似的抗性。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验