• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation of three portable samplers for monitoring airborne fungi.三种用于监测空气中真菌的便携式采样器的评估
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996 May;62(5):1835-8. doi: 10.1128/aem.62.5.1835-1838.1996.
2
Evaluation of portable air samplers for monitoring airborne culturable bacteria.用于监测空气中可培养细菌的便携式空气采样器的评估
AIHAJ. 2000 Nov-Dec;61(6):850-4. doi: 10.1080/15298660008984597.
3
Comparison of field performance of the Andersen N6 single stage and the SAS sampler for airborne fungal propagules.用于空气传播真菌繁殖体的安德森N6单级采样器和SAS采样器的现场性能比较。
Indoor Air. 2001 Mar;11(1):65-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0668.2001.011001065.x.
4
[Airborne fungal community composition in indoor environments in Beijing].[北京室内环境中的空气传播真菌群落组成]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2013 May;34(5):2031-7.
5
The influence of sampling duration on recovery of culturable fungi using the Andersen N6 and RCS bioaerosol samplers.使用安德森N6型和RCS生物气溶胶采样器时,采样持续时间对可培养真菌回收率的影响。
Indoor Air. 2008 Dec;18(6):464-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2008.00547.x. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
6
Identification of saprophytic and allergenic fungi in indoor and outdoor environments.室内外环境中腐生真菌和致敏真菌的鉴定。
Environ Monit Assess. 2018 Sep 6;190(10):574. doi: 10.1007/s10661-018-6952-4.
7
Comparative performance of two air samplers for monitoring airborne fungal propagules.两种用于监测空气中真菌繁殖体的空气采样器的性能比较。
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2003 May;36(5):613-6. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2003000500008. Epub 2003 Apr 22.
8
Relative efficiencies of two air sampling methods and three culture conditions for the assessment of airborne culturable fungi in a poultry farmhouse in France.两种空气采样方法和三种培养条件对法国某家禽养殖场空气中可培养真菌的评估的相对效率。
Environ Res. 2011 Feb;111(2):248-53. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2010.12.005. Epub 2011 Jan 7.
9
Comparison of the Results of Studies of Air Pollution Fungi Using the SAS Super 100, MAS 100, and Air IDEAL.使用SAS Super 100、MAS 100和Air IDEAL对空气污染真菌研究结果的比较
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jul 20;14(7):815. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14070815.
10
A year-round investigation of indoor airborne fungi in Croatia.克罗地亚室内空气传播真菌的全年调查。
Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 2014 Jun;65(2):209-18. doi: 10.2478/10004-1254-65-2014-2483.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantifying Airborne Dispersal Route of in Greenhouses.量化温室中[物质名称缺失]的空气传播途径。
Front Microbiol. 2021 Sep 14;12:716758. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.716758. eCollection 2021.
2
Comparison of the Results of Studies of Air Pollution Fungi Using the SAS Super 100, MAS 100, and Air IDEAL.使用SAS Super 100、MAS 100和Air IDEAL对空气污染真菌研究结果的比较
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jul 20;14(7):815. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14070815.
3
A qualitative and quantitative study monitoring airborne fungal flora in the kidney transplant unit.一项监测肾移植病房空气中真菌菌群的定性和定量研究。
Nephrourol Mon. 2013 Spring;5(2):736-40. doi: 10.5812/numonthly.5379. Epub 2013 Mar 30.
4
A study of air microbe levels in different areas of a hospital.一项关于医院不同区域空气微生物水平的研究。
Curr Microbiol. 2009 Jul;59(1):53-8. doi: 10.1007/s00284-009-9398-7. Epub 2009 Mar 28.

本文引用的文献

1
New sampler for the collection, sizing, and enumeration of viable airborne particles.用于收集、测量大小及计数空气中可存活颗粒的新型采样器。
J Bacteriol. 1958 Nov;76(5):471-84. doi: 10.1128/jb.76.5.471-484.1958.
2
Monitoring airborne fungal spores in an experimental indoor environment to evaluate sampling methods and the effects of human activity on air sampling.在实验室内环境中监测空气中的真菌孢子,以评估采样方法以及人类活动对空气采样的影响。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 Jan;59(1):219-26. doi: 10.1128/aem.59.1.219-226.1993.
3
Evaluation of standard and modified sampling heads for the International PBI Surface Air System bioaerosol samplers.国际PBI表面空气系统生物气溶胶采样器标准采样头和改良采样头的评估。
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1995 Mar;56(3):272-9. doi: 10.1080/15428119591017114.
4
The performance of the Biotest RCS centrifugal air sampler.
J Hosp Infect. 1981 Jun;2(2):181-6. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(81)90028-1.
5
Evaluation of the Andersen viable impactor for single stage sampling.用于单阶段采样的安德森活菌撞击器的评估。
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1985 May;46(5):294-8. doi: 10.1080/15298668591394833.
6
Comparison of bioaerosol sampling methods in barns housing swine.猪舍生物气溶胶采样方法的比较
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 Aug;58(8):2543-51. doi: 10.1128/aem.58.8.2543-2551.1992.
7
Environmental mycology and its importance to public health.
J Med Vet Mycol. 1992;30 Suppl 1:287-305. doi: 10.1080/02681219280000981.
8
Evaluation of eight bioaerosol samplers challenged with aerosols of free bacteria.对八种用游离细菌气溶胶进行挑战的生物气溶胶采样器的评估。
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1992 Oct;53(10):660-7. doi: 10.1080/15298669291360319.

三种用于监测空气中真菌的便携式采样器的评估

Evaluation of three portable samplers for monitoring airborne fungi.

作者信息

Mehta S K, Mishra S K, Pierson D L

机构信息

Biomedical Operations and Research Branch, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996 May;62(5):1835-8. doi: 10.1128/aem.62.5.1835-1838.1996.

DOI:10.1128/aem.62.5.1835-1838.1996
PMID:11536729
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC167961/
Abstract

Airborne fungi were monitored at five sample sites with the Burkard portable, the RCS Plus, and the SAS Super 90 air samplers; the Andersen 2-stage impactor was used for comparison. All samplers were calibrated before being used simultaneously to collect 100-liter samples at each site. The Andersen and Burkard samplers retrieved equivalent volumes of airborne fungi; the SAS Super 90 and RCS Plus measurements did not differ from each other but were significantly lower than those obtained with the Andersen or Burkard samplers. Total fungal counts correlated linearly with Cladosporium and Penicillium counts. Alternaria species, although present at all sites, did not correlate with total count or with amounts of any other fungal genera. Sampler and location significantly influenced fungal counts, but no interactions between samplers and locations were found.

摘要

使用伯卡德便携式采样器、RCS Plus采样器和SAS Super 90空气采样器在五个采样点监测空气传播真菌;使用安德森两级撞击式采样器进行比较。所有采样器在同时用于在每个采样点采集100升样本之前均进行了校准。安德森采样器和伯卡德采样器采集到的空气传播真菌体积相当;SAS Super 90采样器和RCS Plus采样器的测量结果彼此无差异,但显著低于使用安德森采样器或伯卡德采样器获得的测量结果。真菌总数与枝孢菌和青霉菌计数呈线性相关。链格孢属物种虽然在所有采样点均有出现,但与总数或任何其他真菌属的数量均无相关性。采样器和位置对真菌计数有显著影响,但未发现采样器与位置之间的相互作用。