• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种用于监测空气中真菌繁殖体的空气采样器的性能比较。

Comparative performance of two air samplers for monitoring airborne fungal propagules.

作者信息

Távora L G F, Gambale W, Heins-Vaccari E M, Arriagada G L H, Lacaz C S, Santos C R, Levin A S

机构信息

Departamento de Moléstias Infecciosas, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

出版信息

Braz J Med Biol Res. 2003 May;36(5):613-6. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2003000500008. Epub 2003 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1590/s0100-879x2003000500008
PMID:12715080
Abstract

Many studies have attempted to evaluate the importance of airborne fungi in the development of invasive fungal infection, especially for immunocompromised hosts. Several kinds of instruments are available to quantitate fungal propagule levels in air. We compared the performance of the most frequently used air sampler, the Andersen sampler with six stages, with a portable one, the Reuter centrifugal sampler (RCS). A total of 84 samples were analyzed, 42 with each sampler. Twenty-eight different fungal genera were identified in samples analyzed with the Andersen instrument. In samples obtained with the RCS only seven different fungal genera were identified. The three most frequently isolated genera in samples analyzed with both devices were Penicillium, Aspergillus and Cladophialophora. In areas supplied with a high efficiency particulate air filter, fungal spore levels were usually lower when compared to areas without these filters. There was a significant correlation between total fungal propagule measurements taken with both devices on each sampling occasion (Pearson coefficient = 0.50). However, the Andersen device recovered a broader spectrum of fungi. We conclude that the RCS can be used for quantitative estimates of airborne microbiological concentrations. For qualitative studies, however, this device cannot be recommended.

摘要

许多研究试图评估空气传播真菌在侵袭性真菌感染发生发展中的重要性,尤其是对于免疫功能低下的宿主。有几种仪器可用于定量空气中的真菌繁殖体水平。我们比较了最常用的空气采样器——六级安德森采样器与便携式的路透离心采样器(RCS)的性能。共分析了84个样本,每个采样器各42个。在用安德森仪器分析的样本中鉴定出28个不同的真菌属。在用RCS采集的样本中仅鉴定出7个不同的真菌属。两种仪器分析的样本中最常分离出的三个属是青霉属、曲霉属和枝孢瓶霉属。在配备高效空气过滤器的区域,与没有这些过滤器的区域相比,真菌孢子水平通常较低。在每个采样时刻,两种仪器测得的总真菌繁殖体之间存在显著相关性(皮尔逊系数=0.50)。然而,安德森仪器能检测到更广泛的真菌种类。我们得出结论,RCS可用于定量估计空气中微生物的浓度。然而,对于定性研究,不推荐使用该仪器。

相似文献

1
Comparative performance of two air samplers for monitoring airborne fungal propagules.两种用于监测空气中真菌繁殖体的空气采样器的性能比较。
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2003 May;36(5):613-6. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2003000500008. Epub 2003 Apr 22.
2
A field comparison of four samplers for enumerating fungal aerosols I. Sampling characteristics.用于计数真菌气溶胶的四种采样器的现场比较 I. 采样特性
Indoor Air. 2004 Oct;14(5):360-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00259.x.
3
Comparison of field performance of the Andersen N6 single stage and the SAS sampler for airborne fungal propagules.用于空气传播真菌繁殖体的安德森N6单级采样器和SAS采样器的现场性能比较。
Indoor Air. 2001 Mar;11(1):65-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0668.2001.011001065.x.
4
A field comparison of four fungal aerosol sampling instruments: inter-sampler calibrations and caveats.四种真菌气溶胶采样仪器的现场比较:采样器间的校准及注意事项
Indoor Air. 2004 Oct;14(5):367-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00260.x.
5
The influence of sampling duration on recovery of culturable fungi using the Andersen N6 and RCS bioaerosol samplers.使用安德森N6型和RCS生物气溶胶采样器时,采样持续时间对可培养真菌回收率的影响。
Indoor Air. 2008 Dec;18(6):464-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2008.00547.x. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
6
Evaluation of three portable samplers for monitoring airborne fungi.三种用于监测空气中真菌的便携式采样器的评估
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996 May;62(5):1835-8. doi: 10.1128/aem.62.5.1835-1838.1996.
7
Comparative performance of impactor air samplers for quantification of fungal contamination.撞击式空气采样器用于真菌污染定量的比较性能
J Hosp Infect. 2001 Feb;47(2):149-55. doi: 10.1053/jhin.2000.0883.
8
The relation between fungal propagules in indoor air and home characteristics.室内空气中真菌繁殖体与家庭特征之间的关系。
Allergy. 2001 May;56(5):419-24. doi: 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2001.056005419.x.
9
[Airborne fungal community composition in indoor environments in Beijing].[北京室内环境中的空气传播真菌群落组成]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2013 May;34(5):2031-7.
10
Short-term versus long-term filter cassette sampling for viable fungi in indoor air: comparative performance of the Sartorius MD8 and the GSP sampler.室内空气中活真菌的短期与长期滤膜盒采样:赛多利斯MD8和GSP采样器的性能比较
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2002 Oct;205(6):443-51. doi: 10.1078/1438-4639-00183.