Evans M L
Department of Plant Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus 43210.
Plant Physiol. 1991;95(1):1-5. doi: 10.1104/pp.95.1.1.
Our increasing capabilities for quantitative hormone analysis and automated high resolution growth studies have allowed a reassessment of the classical Cholodny-Went hypothesis of gravitropism. According to this hypothesis, gravity induces redistribution of auxin toward the lower side of the organ and this causes the growth asymmetry that leads to reorientation. Arguments against the Cholodny-Went hypothesis that were based primarily on concerns over the timing and magnitude of the development of hormone asymmetry are countered by recent evidence that such asymmetry develops early and is sufficiently large to account for curvature. Thus, it appears that the Cholodny-Went hypothesis is fundamentally valid. However, recent comparative studies of the kinetics of curvature and the timing of the development of hormone asymmetry indicate that this hypothesis alone cannot account for the intricacies of the gravitropic response. It appears that time-dependent gravity-induced changes in hormone sensitivity as well as changes in sensitivity of the gravity receptor play important roles in the response.
我们在定量激素分析和自动化高分辨率生长研究方面不断提高的能力,使得对经典的向重力性Cholodny-Went假说进行重新评估成为可能。根据这一假说,重力诱导生长素向器官的下侧重新分布,这导致了生长不对称,进而导致重新定向。主要基于对激素不对称发展的时间和程度的担忧而对Cholodny-Went假说提出的反对意见,被最近的证据所反驳,即这种不对称很早就出现了,而且足够大,足以解释弯曲现象。因此,Cholodny-Went假说似乎在根本上是有效的。然而,最近对弯曲动力学和激素不对称发展时间的比较研究表明,仅这一假说无法解释向重力性反应的复杂性。看来,重力诱导的激素敏感性随时间的变化以及重力受体敏感性的变化在该反应中起着重要作用。