Raup D M
Department of Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1989;325:421-31; discussion 431-5.
The dramatic increase in our knowledge of large-body impacts that have occurred in Earth's history has led to strong arguments for the plausibility of meteorite impact as a cause of extinction. Proof of causation is often hampered, however, by our inability to demonstrate the synchronism of specific impacts and extinctions. A central problem is range truncation: the last reported occurrences of fossil taxa generally underestimate the true times of extinction. Range truncation, because of gaps in sedimentation, lack of preservation, or lack of discovery, can make sudden extinctions appear gradual and gradual extinctions appear sudden. Also, stepwise extinction may appear as an artefact of range truncation. These effects are demonstrated by experiments performed on data from field collections of Cretaceous ammonities from Zumaya (Spain). The challenge for future research is to develop a new calculus for treating biostratigraphic data so that fossils can provide more accurate assessments of the timing of extinctions.
我们对地球历史上发生的大型天体撞击的了解急剧增加,这使得关于陨石撞击作为灭绝原因的合理性有了有力论据。然而,由于我们无法证明特定撞击和灭绝的同步性,因果关系的证据常常受到阻碍。一个核心问题是范围截断:最后报告的化石分类单元出现时间通常低估了真正的灭绝时间。由于沉积间断、保存缺失或未被发现导致的范围截断,会使突然灭绝看起来是渐进的,而渐进灭绝看起来是突然的。此外,逐步灭绝可能表现为范围截断的假象。对来自西班牙苏马亚白垩纪菊石野外采集数据进行的实验证明了这些影响。未来研究面临的挑战是开发一种新的计算方法来处理生物地层数据,以便化石能够提供更准确的灭绝时间评估。