Obiechina A E, Oji C, Fasola A O
Dental Centre, University College Hospital, P.M.B. 5116, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Odontostomatol Trop. 2001 Jun;24(94):33-6.
This study was conducted in three centres. 717 impacted mandibular third molars were extracted from 517 patients. 69.1% of the extractions were in patients aged 25 years and below. A total of 96.1% extractions were done under local anaesthesia while 3.9% were under general anaesthesia. The lingual bone split technique was used in 2.5% extractions while the bur was used in 97.5% extraction. The patient's preference, the number of teeth to be extracted, and the depth of impaction were the main predicators in the choice of anaesthesia. Majority of third molars with a depth of 5 mm or more were extracted under local anaesthesia. Paraesthesia of the inferior dental nerve and alveolar osteitis were more frequent when extractions were done using the bur technique under local anaesthesia, while paraesthesia of the lingual nerve was more when extractions were performed using the lingual bone split technique under general anaesthesia.
本研究在三个中心进行。从517例患者中拔除了717颗下颌阻生第三磨牙。69.1%的拔牙手术患者年龄在25岁及以下。总共96.1%的拔牙手术在局部麻醉下进行,而3.9%在全身麻醉下进行。2.5%的拔牙手术采用舌侧骨劈开技术,而97.5%的拔牙手术使用牙钻。患者的偏好、拔牙数量和阻生深度是麻醉选择的主要预测因素。大多数深度达5毫米或更深的第三磨牙在局部麻醉下拔除。在局部麻醉下使用牙钻技术拔牙时,下牙槽神经感觉异常和干槽症更为常见,而在全身麻醉下采用舌侧骨劈开技术拔牙时,舌神经感觉异常更为常见。