Roland M, Campbell S, Wilkin D
National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
J Manag Med. 2001;15(3):188-201. doi: 10.1108/02689230110403678.
Clinical governance is a new policy introduced by the UK government to improve quality of care in the National Health Service; it imposes a "duty of quality" on all NHS organisations, and aims to bring together managerial, organisational and clinical approaches to improving quality of care. Infrastructures have been established to support quality improvement in NHS organisations and priorities for quality improvement have been established. Initial approaches are largely educational. However, information on quality of care is starting to be shared, and experiments are being conducted with a range of financial and contractual incentives for quality improvement. For widespread cultural change to occur, a "no blame" approach to quality improvement will be necessary; this may be incompatible with the need to identify and eliminate bad practice. Other tensions include the rapid pace of change being centrally driven and uneven development of the infrastructure to support clinical governance. What has not yet been shown is that quality of care has improved. It is too early to say this yet. Given the magnitude both of the vision and the work required, it is unlikely that change will be rapid, or seen on a widespread scale.
临床治理是英国政府推出的一项新政策,旨在提高国民医疗服务体系的医疗质量;它赋予了所有国民医疗服务机构“质量责任”,并旨在将管理、组织和临床方法结合起来以提高医疗质量。已建立起基础设施来支持国民医疗服务机构的质量改进工作,并确定了质量改进的优先事项。最初的方法主要是教育性质的。然而,有关医疗质量的信息开始得到共享,并且正在开展一系列旨在促进质量改进的财务和合同激励措施试验。要实现广泛的文化变革,采取“无责备”的质量改进方法将是必要的;这可能与识别和消除不良做法的需求不相容。其他矛盾还包括由中央推动的变革速度过快以及支持临床治理的基础设施发展不均衡。目前尚未证明医疗质量已经得到改善。现在说这个还为时过早。鉴于愿景的宏大和所需开展的工作规模,变革不太可能迅速发生,也不太可能广泛出现。