• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

OPTIGOV-一种评估医疗服务提供者实施临床治理的新方法。

OPTIGOV - A new methodology for evaluating Clinical Governance implementation by health providers.

机构信息

Clinical Governance Unit, Institute of Hygiene of the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Jun 21;10:174. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-174.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-10-174
PMID:20565967
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2904759/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of Clinical Governance (CG) is to the pursuit of quality in health care through the integration of all the activities impacting on the patient into a single strategy.OPTIGOV (Optimizing Health Care Governance) is a methodology for the assessment of the level of implementation of CG within healthcare organizations. The aim of this paper is to explain the process underlying the development of OPTIGOV, and describe its characteristics and steps.

METHODS

OPTIGOV was developed in 2006 by the Institute of Hygiene of the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart and Eurogroup Consulting Alliance. The main steps of the process were: choice of areas for analysis and questionnaire development, based on a review of scientific literature; assignment of scores and weights to individual questions and areas; implementation of a software interfaceable with Microsoft Office.

RESULTS

OPTIGOV consists of: a) a hospital audit with a structured approach; b) development of an improvement operational plan. A questionnaire divided into 13 areas of analysis is used. For each area there is a form with a variable number of questions and "closed" answers. A score is assigned to each answer, area of analysis, healthcare department and unit. The single scores can be gathered for the organization as a whole.The software application allows for collation of data, calculation of scores and development of benchmarks to allow comparisons between healthcare organizations. Implementation consists of three stages: the preparation phase includes a kick off meeting, selection of interviewees and development of a survey plan. The registration phase includes hospital audits, reviewing of hospital documentation, data collection and score processing. Lastly, results are processed, inserted into a final report, and discussed in a meeting with the Hospital Board and in a final workshop.

CONCLUSIONS

The OPTIGOV methodology for the evaluation of CG implementation was developed with an evidence-based approach. The ongoing adoption of OPTIGOV in several projects will put to the test its potential to realistically represent the organization status, pinpoint criticalities and transferable best practices, provide a plan for improvement, and contribute to triggering changes and pursuit of quality in health care.

摘要

背景

临床治理(Clinical Governance,CG)的目的是通过将所有影响患者的活动整合到一个单一的策略中,追求医疗保健的质量。OPTIGOV(优化医疗保健治理)是一种评估医疗保健组织中 CG 实施水平的方法。本文旨在解释开发 OPTIGOV 的基本过程,并描述其特点和步骤。

方法

OPTIGOV 由天主教圣心大学卫生研究所和 Eurogroup 咨询联盟于 2006 年开发。该过程的主要步骤包括:基于文献综述,选择分析领域和问卷开发;为个别问题和领域分配分数和权重;实现与 Microsoft Office 兼容的软件接口。

结果

OPTIGOV 由以下部分组成:a)采用结构化方法进行医院审计;b)制定改进操作计划。使用一份分为 13 个分析领域的问卷。对于每个领域,都有一个带有可变数量问题和“封闭式”答案的表格。为每个答案、分析领域、医疗保健部门和单位分配一个分数。可以将单个分数汇总为整个组织。该软件应用程序允许数据的整理、分数的计算和基准的制定,以允许医疗保健组织之间进行比较。实施包括三个阶段:准备阶段包括启动会议、选择受访者和制定调查计划。注册阶段包括医院审计、审查医院文件、数据收集和分数处理。最后,处理结果,将其插入最终报告,并在与医院董事会的会议和最终研讨会上进行讨论。

结论

采用循证方法开发了用于评估 CG 实施情况的 OPTIGOV 方法。该方法在多个项目中的持续采用将检验其真实反映组织现状、查明关键问题和可转移的最佳实践、提供改进计划以及促进医疗保健质量变化和追求的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f82f/2904759/95768d8f2f71/1472-6963-10-174-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f82f/2904759/cd15d5df7709/1472-6963-10-174-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f82f/2904759/3c1ff8defb5d/1472-6963-10-174-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f82f/2904759/95768d8f2f71/1472-6963-10-174-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f82f/2904759/cd15d5df7709/1472-6963-10-174-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f82f/2904759/3c1ff8defb5d/1472-6963-10-174-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f82f/2904759/95768d8f2f71/1472-6963-10-174-3.jpg

相似文献

1
OPTIGOV - A new methodology for evaluating Clinical Governance implementation by health providers.OPTIGOV-一种评估医疗服务提供者实施临床治理的新方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Jun 21;10:174. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-174.
2
"Wind of change": the role of human centered healthcare factors in the implementation of clinical governance in an Italian University teaching hospital.“变革之风”:以人为本的医疗保健因素在意大利一所大学教学医院实施临床治理中的作用
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2016 Apr-Jun;52(2):281-8. doi: 10.4415/ANN_16_02_22.
3
Does Clinical Governance influence the quality of medical records?临床治理会影响病历质量吗?
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2018 Apr-Jun;54(2):104-108. doi: 10.4415/ANN_18_02_05.
4
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Does clinical governance influence the appropriateness of hospital stay?临床治理是否会影响住院时间的合理性?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Apr 3;15:142. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0795-2.
7
Evidence-based clinical guidelines in Kyrgyz Republic.吉尔吉斯共和国基于证据的临床指南。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27 Suppl 1:S45-6. doi: 10.3233/JRS-150683.
8
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
9
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
10
Evaluation systems for clinical governance development: a comparative study.临床治理发展评估系统:一项比较研究。
Acta Med Iran. 2014;52(8):607-12.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing Clinical Governance Awareness and Implementation Among Healthcare Professionals in Madinah, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.沙特阿拉伯麦地那医疗保健专业人员临床治理意识与实施情况评估:一项横断面研究
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Apr 28;18:2349-2360. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S515427. eCollection 2025.
2
Developing a new clinical governance framework for chronic diseases in primary care: an umbrella review.为初级保健中的慢性病制定新的临床治理框架:一项综合综述。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 28;8(7):e020626. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020626.
3
Validating and determining the weight of items used for evaluating clinical governance implementation based on analytic hierarchy process model.

本文引用的文献

1
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.评估卫生保健干预措施的研究的系统评价和Meta分析报告的PRISMA声明:解释与详述。
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100.
2
[Evolution and practical application of the concept of clinical governance in Italy].[意大利临床治理概念的演变与实际应用]
Ann Ig. 2008 Sep-Oct;20(5):509-15.
3
Identifying organizational capacities and incentives for clinical data-sharing: the case of a regional perinatal information system.
基于层次分析法模型验证和确定用于评估临床治理实施的项目权重。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015 Apr 8;4(10):645-51. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.79.
4
Patients and Public Involvement in Patient Safety and Treatment Process in Hospitals Affiliated to Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Iran, 2013.2013年,伊朗库姆医科大学附属医院患者及公众参与患者安全与治疗过程
Nurs Midwifery Stud. 2015 Jun;4(2):e24755. doi: 10.17795/nmsjournal24755. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
5
Rocky milieu: challenges of effective integration of clinical risk management into hospitals in Iran. rocky 环境:将临床风险管理有效融入伊朗医院所面临的挑战。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2015 May 11;10:27040. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v10.27040. eCollection 2015.
6
Does clinical governance influence the appropriateness of hospital stay?临床治理是否会影响住院时间的合理性?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Apr 3;15:142. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0795-2.
7
Hospitals' readiness to implement clinical governance.医院实施临床治理的准备情况。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014 Oct 30;4(2):69-74. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2014.111. eCollection 2015 Feb.
8
Measuring progress with clinical governance development in New Zealand: perceptions of senior doctors in 2010 and 2012.衡量新西兰临床治理发展的进展:2010年和2012年资深医生的看法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Nov 4;14:547. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0547-8.
9
Challenges in evaluating clinical governance systems in iran: a qualitative study.伊朗临床治理系统评估中的挑战:一项定性研究。
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014 Apr;16(4):e13421. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.13421. Epub 2014 Apr 5.
10
Is having quality as an item on the executive board agenda associated with the implementation of quality management systems in European hospitals: a quantitative analysis.将质量作为执行委员会会议议程的一项内容是否与欧洲医院质量管理体系的实施相关联:一项定量分析。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Apr;26 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):92-9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu017. Epub 2014 Feb 17.
识别临床数据共享的组织能力和激励因素:以一个区域围产期信息系统为例。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 Mar-Apr;15(2):195-7. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2475. Epub 2007 Dec 20.
4
An empirical assessment of social structural and cultural change in clinical directorates.临床科室社会结构与文化变革的实证评估
Health Care Anal. 2006 Dec;14(4):185-93. doi: 10.1007/s10728-006-0025-5.
5
Experiences of health professionals who conducted root cause analyses after undergoing a safety improvement programme.参与安全改进计划后进行根本原因分析的卫生专业人员的经验。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Dec;15(6):393-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.017525.
6
Quality improvement in New Zealand healthcare. Part 7: clinical governance--an attempt to bring quality into reality.新西兰医疗保健领域的质量改进。第7部分:临床治理——将质量变为现实的一次尝试。
N Z Med J. 2006 Oct 13;119(1243):U2259.
7
Re-energising Clinical Governance through Integrated Governance.通过整合治理重振临床治理。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006;44(6):692-3. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2006.132.
8
International innovations in health care: quality improvements in the United Kingdom.国际医疗保健创新:英国的质量改进
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2005 Jul(833):1-16.
9
Shared governance and shared leadership: meeting the challenges of implementation.共同治理与共同领导:应对实施挑战
J Nurs Manag. 2005 Jan;13(1):4-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2004.00455.x.
10
Achieving progress through clinical governance? A national study of health care managers' perceptions in the NHS in England.通过临床治理取得进展?一项关于英格兰国民保健制度中医疗保健管理人员看法的全国性研究。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13(5):335-43. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.5.335.