Alldredge B K, Gelb A M, Isaacs S M, Corry M D, Allen F, Ulrich S, Gottwald M D, O'Neil N, Neuhaus J M, Segal M R, Lowenstein D H
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, San Francisco General Hospital and the University of California, USA.
N Engl J Med. 2001 Aug 30;345(9):631-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa002141.
It is uncertain whether the administration of benzodiazepines by paramedics is an effective and safe treatment for out-of-hospital status epilepticus.
We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial to evaluate intravenous benzodiazepines administered by paramedics for the treatment of out-of-hospital status epilepticus. Adults with prolonged (lasting five minutes or more) or repetitive generalized convulsive seizures received intravenous diazepam (5 mg), lorazepam (2 mg), or placebo. An identical second injection was given if needed.
Of the 205 patients enrolled, 66 received lorazepam, 68 received diazepam, and 71 received placebo. Status epilepticus had been terminated on arrival at the emergency department in more patients treated with lorazepam (59.1 percent) or diazepam (42.6 percent) than patients given placebo (21.1 percent) (P=0.001). After adjustment for covariates, the odds ratio for termination of status epilepticus by the time of arrival in the lorazepam group as compared with the placebo group was 4.8 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.9 to 13.0). The odds ratio was 1.9 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.8 to 4.4) in the lorazepam group as compared with the diazepam group and 2.3 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.0 to 5.9) in the diazepam group as compared with the placebo group. The rates of respiratory or circulatory complications (indicated by bag valve-mask ventilation or an attempt at intubation, hypotension, or cardiac dysrhythmia) after the study treatment was administered were 10.6 percent for the lorazepam group, 10.3 percent for the diazepam group, and 22.5 percent for the placebo group (P=0.08).
Benzodiazepines are safe and effective when administered by paramedics for out-of-hospital status epilepticus in adults. Lorazepam is likely to be a better therapy than diazepam.
护理人员给予苯二氮䓬类药物是否是治疗院外癫痫持续状态的有效且安全的方法尚不确定。
我们进行了一项随机双盲试验,以评估护理人员给予静脉注射苯二氮䓬类药物治疗院外癫痫持续状态的效果。患有持续性(持续五分钟或更长时间)或反复全身性惊厥发作的成年人接受静脉注射地西泮(5毫克)、劳拉西泮(2毫克)或安慰剂。如有需要,给予相同的第二次注射。
在纳入的205名患者中,66名接受了劳拉西泮治疗,68名接受了地西泮治疗,71名接受了安慰剂治疗。与接受安慰剂治疗的患者(21.1%)相比,接受劳拉西泮治疗(59.1%)或地西泮治疗(42.6%)的患者在到达急诊科时癫痫持续状态已终止(P=0.001)。在对协变量进行调整后,与安慰剂组相比,劳拉西泮组在到达时癫痫持续状态终止的优势比为4.8(95%置信区间,1.9至13.0)。与地西泮组相比,劳拉西泮组的优势比为1.9(95%置信区间,0.8至4.4);与安慰剂组相比,地西泮组的优势比为2.3(95%置信区间,1.0至5.9)。在给予研究治疗后,劳拉西泮组呼吸或循环并发症(通过袋阀面罩通气或插管尝试、低血压或心律失常表明)的发生率为10.6%,地西泮组为10.3%,安慰剂组为22.5%(P=0.08)。
护理人员给予苯二氮䓬类药物治疗成人院外癫痫持续状态是安全有效的。劳拉西泮可能是比地西泮更好的治疗方法。