Is the NHS guilty of ageism by not giving free personal care for some older people in England.
作者信息
Knight P V
出版信息
BMJ. 2001 Aug 11;323(7308):337.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
2
A personal question. NHS Plan.一个私人问题。《国民保健服务计划》。
Nurs Stand. 2000;14(47):12-3. doi: 10.7748/ns.14.47.12.s29.
3
Scotland may no longer remain 'the free' for those over 65.对于65岁以上的人来说，苏格兰可能不再“自由”。
Nurs Older People. 2008 Mar;20(2):7-8.
4
Should free personal care be available for all older people?是否应该为所有老年人提供免费的个人护理服务？
Nurs Times. 2001;97(11):17.
5
Elderly people will get free nursing care.老年人将获得免费护理服务。
BMJ. 2000 Aug 5;321(7257):317.
6
A survey of access to medical services in nursing and residential homes in England.对英格兰护理院和养老院医疗服务可及性的一项调查。
Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Jul;52(480):545-8.
7
A Slovenian model of integrated care for older people can offer solutions for NHS services.斯洛文尼亚的老年人综合护理模式可为英国国民医疗服务体系提供解决方案。
Nurs Times. 2009;105(49-50):10-2.
8
A betrayal of trust?对信任的背叛？
Nurs Older People. 2003 Dec;15(9):6.
9
Defining the boundaries: nursing and personal care.
Nurs Stand. 2000 Oct 4;15(3):43-5. doi: 10.7748/ns2000.10.15.3.43.c2928.
10
Row continues over proposed reform of residential care in UK.关于英国住宿护理机构改革的提议争论仍在继续。
Lancet. 2000 Sep 9;356(9233):919. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)73907-6.
引用本文的文献
1
Optimising drug utilisation in long term care.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20(3):143-52. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200220030-00001.
Zotero 插件