Glendinning Caroline, Jacobs Sally, Alborz Alison, Hann Mark
National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester.
Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Jul;52(480):545-8.
Residential and nursing homes make major demands on NHS services.
To investigate patterns of access to medical services for residents in homes for older people.
Telephone survey.
All nursing and dual registered homes and one in four residential homes located in a stratified random sample of 72 English primary care group/trust (PCG/T) areas.
A structured questionnaire investigating home characteristics, numbers of general practitioners (GPs) or practices per home, homes' policies for registering new residents with GPs, existence of payments to GPs, GP services provided to homes, and access to specialist medical care.
There were wide variations in the numbers of GPs providing services to individual homes; this was not entirely dependent on home size. Eight percent of homes paid local GPs for their services to residents; these were more likely to be nursing homes (33%) than residential homes (odds ratio [OR] = 10.82, [95% CI = 4.48 to 26.13], P<0.001) and larger homes (OR for a ten-bed increase = 1.51 [95% CI = 1.28 to 1.79], P<0.001). Larger homes were more likely to encourage residents to register with a 'home' GP (OR for a ten-bed increase = 1.16 [95% CI = 1.04 to 1.31], P = 0.009). Homes paying local GPs were more likely to receive one or more additional services, over and above GPs' core contractual obligations. Few homes had direct access to specialist clinicians.
Extensive variations in homes' policies and local GP services raise serious questions about patient choice, levels of GP services and, above all, about equity between residents within homes, between homes and between those in homes and in the community.
养老院和护理院对国民保健服务提出了重大需求。
调查老年人居住机构中居民获得医疗服务的模式。
电话调查。
在72个英格兰初级保健团体/信托(PCG/T)地区的分层随机样本中,选取所有护理院和双重注册机构以及四分之一的养老院。
采用结构化问卷,调查机构特征、每个机构的全科医生(GP)数量或诊所数量、机构为新居民在全科医生处注册的政策、向全科医生支付费用的情况、提供给机构的全科医生服务以及获得专科医疗护理的情况。
为各个机构提供服务的全科医生数量差异很大;这并不完全取决于机构规模。8%的机构向当地全科医生支付为居民提供服务的费用;这些机构更有可能是护理院(33%),而不是养老院(优势比[OR]=10.82,[95%置信区间=4.48至26.13],P<0.001),且规模较大的机构(床位增加10张的OR=1.51[95%置信区间=1.28至1.79],P<0.001)。规模较大的机构更有可能鼓励居民在“机构内”的全科医生处注册(床位增加10张的OR=1.16[95%置信区间=1.04至1.31],P=0.009)。向当地全科医生支付费用的机构更有可能获得全科医生核心合同义务之外的一项或多项额外服务。很少有机构能直接接触专科临床医生。
机构政策和当地全科医生服务的广泛差异引发了关于患者选择、全科医生服务水平的严重问题,最重要的是,关于机构内居民之间、不同机构之间以及机构居民与社区居民之间的公平性问题。