Mills D S, Mills C B
Animal Behaviour and Cognition Group, University of Lincoln, Caythorpe.
Vet Rec. 2001 Aug 18;149(7):197-9. doi: 10.1136/vr.149.7.197.
Twenty-two cats with a problem of urine spraying in the home were enrolled onto a double-blinded placebo-controlled study designed to evaluate the efficacy of feline facial pheromone (FFP) delivered continuously into the atmosphere in the home through an electrically heated diffuser for controlling the problem. The cats were randomly assigned to treatment or control groups according to a predetermined schedule and later analysis suggested that there were no significant differences in the demographic characteristics of the two groups. Compared with a baseline week during which no treatment was given, the mean level of spraying was significantly lower in the treated group after four weeks, but not significantly lower in the control group. The baseline level of spraying and the treatment, but not the week of treatment, were significant predictors of the amount of spraying during the trial. However, only the type of treatment given was a significant factor in the occurrence of new marks. Linear regression analysis suggested that there was a significant relationship between the amount of spraying and the duration of the use of FFP.
22只在家中有尿液喷洒问题的猫被纳入一项双盲安慰剂对照研究,该研究旨在评估通过电加热扩散器在家中持续释放猫面部信息素(FFP)来控制这一问题的效果。根据预定方案,将猫随机分配到治疗组或对照组,后来的分析表明两组的人口统计学特征没有显著差异。与未进行治疗的基线周相比,治疗组在四周后的平均喷洒水平显著降低,但对照组没有显著降低。喷洒的基线水平和治疗方式是试验期间喷洒量的显著预测因素,但治疗周数不是。然而,只有所给予的治疗类型是新标记出现的显著因素。线性回归分析表明,喷洒量与FFP使用持续时间之间存在显著关系。