• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国左氧氟沙星安全性概况的最新行业信息。

Latest industry information on the safety profile of levofloxacin in the US.

作者信息

Kahn J B

机构信息

Infectious Disease Research, Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical Inc, Raritan, NJ 08869-0602, USA.

出版信息

Chemotherapy. 2001;47 Suppl 3:32-7; discussion 44-8. doi: 10.1159/000057842.

DOI:10.1159/000057842
PMID:11549787
Abstract

This paper reviews the safety data for levofloxacin utilizing reports from clinical and post-marketing surveillance trials. The side effect incidence rates are 1.3% for nausea, 0.1% for anxiety, 0.3% for insomnia, and 0.1% for headache. No levofloxacin-related adverse events were reported at a rate higher than 1.3%, and most were lower. Four clinical trials were reported. Levofloxacin achieved superior clinical and microbiological results compared to ceftriaxone/macrolide combination, and was better tolerated. Results comparing IV azithromycin plus ceftriaxone versus 500 mg levofloxacin in hospitalised CAP demonstrated that levofloxacin performed better, with more adverse events associated with the comparators (levofloxacin 5.3%, comparators 9.3%). High-dose levofloxacin (750 mg) was also evaluated and found to be well tolerated. Surveillance data reported low ADR rates for levofloxacin: nausea 0.8%, rash 0.5%, abdominal pain 0.4%, and diarrhoea, dizziness, and vomiting 0.3%. Worldwide and US surveillance data confirmed that tendon rupture occurred in less than 4 per million prescriptions, taste perversion in less than 3 per million, convulsions in 2 per million, and photosensitivity, hepatitis, hepatic failure, QT prolongation, torsade de pointes or empyema all in less than 1 per million.

摘要

本文利用临床和上市后监测试验的报告回顾了左氧氟沙星的安全性数据。副作用发生率为:恶心1.3%,焦虑0.1%,失眠0.3%,头痛0.1%。未报告与左氧氟沙星相关的不良事件发生率高于1.3%,且大多数更低。报告了四项临床试验。与头孢曲松/大环内酯类药物联合使用相比,左氧氟沙星取得了更好的临床和微生物学结果,且耐受性更好。比较静脉注射阿奇霉素加头孢曲松与500毫克左氧氟沙星治疗住院社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的结果表明,左氧氟沙星表现更佳,对照药物相关的不良事件更多(左氧氟沙星5.3%,对照药物9.3%)。还评估了高剂量左氧氟沙星(750毫克),发现其耐受性良好。监测数据报告左氧氟沙星的不良反应发生率较低:恶心0.8%,皮疹0.5%,腹痛0.4%,腹泻、头晕和呕吐0.3%。全球和美国的监测数据证实,每百万张处方中肌腱断裂的发生率低于4例,味觉异常低于3例,惊厥低于2例,光敏反应、肝炎、肝衰竭、QT间期延长、尖端扭转型室速或脓胸均低于1例。

相似文献

1
Latest industry information on the safety profile of levofloxacin in the US.美国左氧氟沙星安全性概况的最新行业信息。
Chemotherapy. 2001;47 Suppl 3:32-7; discussion 44-8. doi: 10.1159/000057842.
2
Latest industry information on the safety profile of levofloxacin in Japan.关于左氧氟沙星在日本安全性概况的最新行业信息。
Chemotherapy. 2001;47 Suppl 3:38-43; discussion 44-8. doi: 10.1159/000057843.
3
Comparison of side effects of levofloxacin versus other fluoroquinolones.左氧氟沙星与其他氟喹诺酮类药物副作用的比较。
Chemotherapy. 2001;47 Suppl 3:9-14; discussion 44-8. doi: 10.1159/000057839.
4
[Levofloxacin adverse effects, data from clinical trials and pharmacovigilance].
Therapie. 2001 Jan-Feb;56(1):35-40.
5
A comparison of ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, ofloxacin, azithromycin and cefixime examined by observational cohort studies.一项通过观察性队列研究对环丙沙星、诺氟沙星、氧氟沙星、阿奇霉素和头孢克肟进行的比较。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1996 Apr;41(4):277-84. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1996.03013.x.
6
[Adverse drug reaction and rational use of levofloxacin: a prospective study].
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2001 Dec;22(6):405-7.
7
A phase III clinical trial of 0.5% levofloxacin ophthalmic solution versus 0.3% ofloxacin ophthalmic solution for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis.一项比较0.5%左氧氟沙星滴眼液与0.3%氧氟沙星滴眼液治疗细菌性结膜炎的III期临床试验。
Ophthalmology. 2003 Mar;110(3):457-65. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01894-8.
8
A comparison of side effects of levofloxacin to other agents concerning the ecological and microbiological effects on normal human flora.
Chemotherapy. 2001;47 Suppl 3:15-23; discussion 44-8. doi: 10.1159/000057840.
9
Safety of the new fluoroquinolones compared with ciprofloxacin.新型氟喹诺酮类药物与环丙沙星相比的安全性。
J Chemother. 2000 Jan;12 Suppl 1:8-11. doi: 10.1080/1120009x.2000.11782290.
10
A new respiratory fluoroquinolone, oral gemifloxacin: a safety profile in context.一种新型呼吸喹诺酮类药物——口服吉米沙星:综合安全性概况
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2004 May;23(5):421-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2004.02.014.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance assessment and economic analysis of a human Liver-Chip for predictive toxicology.用于预测毒理学的人体肝脏芯片的性能评估与经济分析。
Commun Med (Lond). 2022 Dec 6;2(1):154. doi: 10.1038/s43856-022-00209-1.
2
Hepatotoxicity Related to Anti-tuberculosis Drugs: Mechanisms and Management.抗结核药物相关肝毒性:机制与管理
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2013 Mar;3(1):37-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2012.12.001. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
3
Management of levofloxacin induced anaphylaxis and acute delirium in a palliative care setting.姑息治疗环境中左氧氟沙星诱发过敏反应和急性谵妄的处理
Indian J Palliat Care. 2015 Jan-Apr;21(1):76-8. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.150194.
4
Commentary.评论
J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2012 May;3(2):215-6.
5
High-dose levofloxacin in community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized, open-label study.社区获得性肺炎高剂量左氧氟沙星治疗:一项随机、开放标签研究。
Clin Drug Investig. 2012 Sep 1;32(9):569-76. doi: 10.1007/BF03261911.
6
Rescue Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Infection 2012.2012 年幽门螺杆菌感染的挽救治疗。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2012;2012:974594. doi: 10.1155/2012/974594. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
7
Clinical and histopathologic features of fluoroquinolone-induced liver injury.氟喹诺酮类药物诱导的肝损伤的临床和组织病理学特征。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Jun;9(6):517-523.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.02.019. Epub 2011 Feb 26.
8
Second-line rescue therapy of helicobacter pylori infection.二线补救治疗幽门螺杆菌感染。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2009 Nov;2(6):331-56. doi: 10.1177/1756283X09347109.
9
Levofloxacin-induced Achilles tendinitis in a young adult in the absence of predisposing conditions.左氧氟沙星致年轻成人无诱发因素跟腱炎。
Yonsei Med J. 2010 May;51(3):454-6. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2010.51.3.454.
10
"Rescue" regimens after Helicobacter pylori treatment failure.幽门螺杆菌治疗失败后的“挽救”方案。
World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Sep 21;14(35):5385-402. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.5385.