长效血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(替莫卡普利)和长效钙通道阻滞剂(氨氯地平)对老年高血压患者24小时动态血压的影响。

Effects of long-acting ACE inhibitor (temocapril) and long-acting Ca channel blocker (amlodipine) on 24-h ambulatory BP in elderly hypertensive patients.

作者信息

Eguchi K, Kario K, Shimada K

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Nishiarita Kyoritu Hospital, Saga, Japan.

出版信息

J Hum Hypertens. 2001 Sep;15(9):643-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001252.

Abstract

In a prospective randomised cross-over study, we compared the effects of ACE inhibitor temocapril and calcium channel blocker (CCB) amlodipine on ambulatory blood pressure in 59 asymptomatic elderly hypertensive patients (mean age 69 years). This study was performed in a cross-over fashion after a 2-week placebo period and 4 to 8 weeks each of treatment with temocapril and amlodipine. Of those 59 hypertensive patients, three patients with side effects and 10 patients whose office BPs did not achieve the target BPs were excluded, and the remaining 46 were analysed in this study: they consisted of 30 dippers, with a night time reduction in systolic BP (SBP) > or = 10% and 16 non-dippers, with reduction by < 10%. At the baseline, there were no significant differences in the office, 24-h or daytime BPs between the two groups (dippers and non-dippers). Though the office BPs and daytime BPs were successfully controlled to the same levels with both treatments and in both dipping groups, the antihypertensive effects were stronger with the CCB than with the ACE inhibitor in the night time and morning, especially in non-dippers. We conclude that even though office BPs were controlled successfully to almost the same levels, there is a possibility that these long-acting drugs have differential antihypertensive effects on night time and morning BPs among hypertensive patients with different night time BP dipping statuses.

摘要

在一项前瞻性随机交叉研究中,我们比较了血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂替莫卡普利和钙通道阻滞剂氨氯地平对59例无症状老年高血压患者(平均年龄69岁)动态血压的影响。本研究在2周安慰剂期后采用交叉方式进行,替莫卡普利和氨氯地平各治疗4至8周。在这59例高血压患者中,排除了3例有副作用的患者和10例诊室血压未达目标血压的患者,其余46例纳入本研究分析:其中包括30例杓型血压者,其夜间收缩压(SBP)下降≥10%,以及16例非杓型血压者,其下降<10%。基线时,两组(杓型血压者和非杓型血压者)的诊室血压、24小时血压或日间血压无显著差异。虽然两种治疗方法在两个杓型血压组中均成功地将诊室血压和日间血压控制在相同水平,但夜间和早晨时,钙通道阻滞剂的降压效果比血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂更强,尤其是在非杓型血压者中。我们得出结论,尽管诊室血压成功控制在几乎相同水平,但这些长效药物对不同夜间血压杓型状态的高血压患者的夜间和早晨血压可能有不同的降压效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索