Suppr超能文献

A comparative analysis of domiciliary oxygen therapy in five European countries.

作者信息

Garattini L, Cornago D, Tediosi F

机构信息

Center for Health Economics CESAV, Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Villa Camozzi, 24020 Ranica, Bergamo, Italy.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2001 Nov;58(2):133-49. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(01)00155-5.

Abstract

This comparative study analyses the domestic market of domiciliary oxygen therapy in five European countries (Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, and the UK) according to a common checklist of subjects. Domestic legislation, prescription procedures, delivery, and the market situation concerning oxygen therapy were considered. The analysis involved (i) reviewing the literature on oxygen therapy in national and international journals, and (ii) interviewing a selected expert panel of market operators in each country (composed of at least one civil servant, one physician, one distributor, and one oxygen manufacturer). The analysis did not find any specific relationship between the health care system framework and the oxygen therapy market, except for a greater inclination towards home care in national health services. In all these countries oxygen therapy is reimbursed, but the type of supply and its diffusion differ widely. The spread of domiciliary care has undermined the traditional role of pharmacies in the oxygen distribution chain in all countries except Italy. The study did not help identify any specific country that can be considered a benchmark for oxygen therapy, each one dealing with oxygen therapy in a different way. An economic evaluation of the different supply modalities could help improve decision making by public authorities.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验