Mello M M, Brennan T A
Harvard School of Public Health in Boston, USA.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 Sep-Oct;20(5):101-17. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.20.5.101.
In the 1990s more than 41,000 patients underwent high-dose chemotherapy plus autologous bone marrow transplant (HDC-ABMT) for breast cancer, despite a paucity of clinical evidence of its efficacy. Most health plans reluctantly agreed to cover the treatment in response to intensive political lobbying and the threat of litigation. The results of five recent major randomized trials showed that HDC-ABMT offers no advantage over standard-dose treatment for breast cancer. Our experience with HDC-ABMT coverage cautions against allowing politics to overwhelm science in the area of evaluating experimental procedures, and against relying on the courts as a means of resolving disagreements about coverage of these interventions.
在20世纪90年代,超过41000名乳腺癌患者接受了大剂量化疗加自体骨髓移植(HDC-ABMT),尽管其疗效的临床证据不足。大多数健康保险计划勉强同意承保这种治疗,以回应密集的政治游说和诉讼威胁。最近五项主要随机试验的结果表明,HDC-ABMT在治疗乳腺癌方面并不比标准剂量治疗更具优势。我们在HDC-ABMT承保方面的经验提醒我们,在评估实验程序领域,要谨防让政治压倒科学,也要谨防依赖法院来解决关于这些干预措施承保范围的分歧。