Herlitz J, Karlson B W, Sjölin M, Lindqvist J
Division of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, S-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden.
Heart. 2001 Oct;86(4):391-6. doi: 10.1136/heart.86.4.391.
To describe the mortality during the subsequent 10 years for subsets of patients hospitalised for suspected acute coronary syndrome.
All patients who were admitted to the emergency department in one hospital during 21 months for chest pain or other symptoms raising suspicion of an acute coronary syndrome were registered. From this baseline population three subgroups were defined among those being hospitalised: patients who developed a Q wave acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n = 306); patients who developed a non-Q wave AMI (n = 527); and patients who developed confirmed or possible myocardial ischaemia (unstable angina pectoris) (n = 1274). These three groups were compared in terms of 10 year mortality.
Patients who developed a non-Q wave AMI had the highest 10 year mortality (70.3%), significantly higher than those who developed a Q wave AMI (60.1%; p = 0.004) and those who had confirmed or possible myocardial ischaemia (50.1%; p < 0.0001). There was no difference between patients with confirmed and those with possible myocardial ischaemia (50.0% and 50.1%, respectively). After correction for dissimilarities in age, sex, and history the adjusted risk ratio for death in patients with a non-Q wave AMI compared with Q wave AMI was 1.01 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82 to 1.25). The corresponding risk ratio for death in patients with a non-Q wave AMI compared with confirmed or possible myocardial ischaemia was 1.91 (95% CI 1.64 to 2.23). There was also an imbalance in drug regimens among groups.
This study shows that in a non-selected population of patients hospitalised with a suspected acute coronary syndrome, the highest risk of death is found in those with a non-Q wave AMI and the lowest in those with confirmed or possible myocardial ischaemia. Thus, patients with a Q wave AMI have a long term mortality risk intermediate between the two fractions defined as having unstable coronary artery disease. However, adjusting these results for age and history of cardiovascular disease eliminated the observed difference in mortality between non-Q wave and Q wave AMI. Furthermore, an imbalance in drug regimens might have affected the outcome.
描述因疑似急性冠状动脉综合征住院的患者亚组在随后10年中的死亡率。
登记了在21个月内因胸痛或其他引起急性冠状动脉综合征怀疑症状而入住一家医院急诊科的所有患者。在这些住院患者中定义了三个亚组:发生Q波急性心肌梗死(AMI)的患者(n = 306);发生非Q波AMI的患者(n = 527);以及发生确诊或可能心肌缺血(不稳定型心绞痛)的患者(n = 1274)。比较这三组的10年死亡率。
发生非Q波AMI的患者10年死亡率最高(70.3%),显著高于发生Q波AMI的患者(60.1%;p = 0.004)以及发生确诊或可能心肌缺血的患者(50.1%;p < 0.0001)。确诊心肌缺血患者与可能心肌缺血患者之间无差异(分别为50.0%和50.1%)。在校正年龄、性别和病史差异后,非Q波AMI患者与Q波AMI患者相比的死亡调整风险比为1.01(95%置信区间(CI)0.82至1.25)。非Q波AMI患者与确诊或可能心肌缺血患者相比的相应死亡风险比为1.91(95%CI 1.64至2.23)。各组之间药物治疗方案也存在不均衡。
本研究表明,在未经过选择的因疑似急性冠状动脉综合征住院的患者群体中,非Q波AMI患者死亡风险最高,确诊或可能心肌缺血患者死亡风险最低。因此,Q波AMI患者的长期死亡风险介于定义为患有不稳定冠状动脉疾病的两个类别之间。然而,对这些结果进行年龄和心血管疾病史校正后,消除了非Q波和Q波AMI之间观察到的死亡率差异。此外,药物治疗方案的不均衡可能影响了结果。