Brown I
Community Health Sheffield NHS Trust, University of Sheffield, UK.
Health Soc Care Community. 2001 May;9(3):159-67. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2001.00292.x.
A multiple case study design was used to explore dimensions of organizational values in general practice with respect to developing public involvement. The study was undertaken in an urban district in England with data collected through in-depth individual and focus group interviews with service providers and service users. Four general practice organizations were randomly selected for study after sorting all in the district according to their record of developing involvement activities. The case studies provide evidence of how organizational values can differ markedly in general practice in relation to ideas of public involvement, with consequences for the quantity and quality of activities for involving local people and service users. The differences manifest themselves in the beliefs and attitudes of service providers about the purpose of the organization and the types of relationships that are appropriate with service users and local people. Service users appear to be very perceptive to the underlying ethos and purpose to their practice organization and this affects their responsiveness to initiatives for their involvement. The dimensions of the different values found in the study appear to be essentially the same as a number of established empirical findings of variations in values in general practice: an orientation to a narrow medical role and to general practice as a business are associated with a low valuation of involvement; an orientation to teamwork and to a broader social role appear more congruent with the development of involvement. Power is a critical issue in this setting with evidence in the study of the dominance of the medical practitioners in establishing organizational values and the nature of public involvement activities.
本研究采用多案例研究设计,以探讨在发展公众参与方面,全科医疗中组织价值观的维度。该研究在英格兰的一个城区开展,通过对服务提供者和服务使用者进行深入的个人访谈和焦点小组访谈来收集数据。在根据各组织开展参与活动的记录对该城区所有全科医疗组织进行排序后,随机选取了四个组织进行研究。案例研究表明,在全科医疗中,组织价值观在公众参与理念方面可能存在显著差异,这对让当地居民和服务使用者参与活动的数量和质量产生影响。这些差异体现在服务提供者对组织目的以及与服务使用者和当地居民建立何种适当关系的信念和态度上。服务使用者似乎对其所在全科医疗组织的潜在精神和目的非常敏感,这影响了他们对参与倡议的响应程度。研究中发现的不同价值观维度似乎与一些已有的关于全科医疗中价值观差异的实证研究结果基本相同:专注于狭义医疗角色以及将全科医疗视为商业行为与对参与的低评价相关;注重团队合作和更广泛社会角色的取向似乎更符合参与活动的发展。在这种情况下,权力是一个关键问题,研究证据表明,在确立组织价值观和公众参与活动性质方面,医生占据主导地位。