Bell J S, Campbell D M, Graham W J, Penney G C, Ryan M, Hall M H
Dugald Baird Centre for Research in Women's Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, UK.
BJOG. 2001 Sep;108(9):910-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00214.x.
To determine whether the higher levels of obstetric intervention and maternity service use among older women can be explained by obstetric complications.
A retrospective analysis of routinely collected data from the Aberdeen Maternity and Neonatal Databank.
All residents of Aberdeen city district delivering singleton infants at the Maternity Hospital 1988-1997 (28,484 deliveries).
Odds ratios for each intervention in older maternal age groups compared with women aged 20-29. Interventions considered include obstetric interventions (induction of labour, augmentation, epidural use, assisted delivery, caesarean section) and raised maternity service use (more than two prenatal scans, amniocentesis, antenatal admission to hospital, admission at delivery of more than five days, infant resuscitation, and admission to the neonatal unit).
Logistic regression was used to investigate the association between maternal age and the incidence of interventions. The odds ratios for each intervention were then adjusted for relevant obstetric complications and maternal socio-demographic characteristics.
Levels of amniocentesis, caesarean section, assisted delivery, induction, and augmentation (in primiparae) are all higher among older women. Maternity service use also increases significantly with age: older women are more likely to have an antenatal admission, more than two scans, a hospital stay at delivery of more than five days, and have their baby admitted to a neonatal unit. Controlling for relevant obstetric complications reveals several examples of effect modification, but does not eliminate the age effect for most interventions in most groups of women.
Higher levels of intervention among older women are not explained by the obstetric complications we considered.
确定老年女性较高的产科干预水平和产科服务利用率是否可由产科并发症来解释。
对阿伯丁产科与新生儿数据库常规收集的数据进行回顾性分析。
1988 - 1997年在产科医院分娩单胎婴儿的阿伯丁市所有居民(28484例分娩)。
将老年产妇年龄组的每种干预措施与20 - 29岁女性进行比较的比值比。所考虑的干预措施包括产科干预(引产、产程加强、硬膜外麻醉使用、助产、剖宫产)以及产科服务利用率提高(超过两次产前扫描、羊膜穿刺术、产前住院、分娩时住院超过五天、婴儿复苏以及新生儿重症监护室收治)。
采用逻辑回归研究产妇年龄与干预发生率之间的关联。然后针对相关产科并发症和产妇社会人口学特征对每种干预措施的比值比进行调整。
老年女性的羊膜穿刺术、剖宫产、助产、引产和产程加强(初产妇)水平均较高。产科服务利用率也随年龄显著增加:老年女性更有可能产前住院、进行超过两次扫描、分娩时住院超过五天以及其婴儿入住新生儿重症监护室。控制相关产科并发症后发现了一些效应修正的例子,但并未消除大多数女性群体中大多数干预措施的年龄效应。
我们所考虑的产科并发症并不能解释老年女性较高的干预水平。