Lanzino G, Couture D, Andreoli A, Guterman L R, Hopkins L N
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Neurosurgery. 2001 Oct;49(4):913-23; discussion 923-4. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200110000-00025.
DESPITE EVIDENCE OF the efficacy of carotid endarterectomy from the large randomized multicenter trials completed in the 1990s, the physician who treats patients with carotid artery stenosis still is faced with a difficult management decision. More recently, subgroup analyses have been conducted of asymptomatic and symptomatic patients enrolled in these trials to identify clinical and radiological factors that increase the rates of morbidity and mortality associated with surgery, as well as those that increase the risk of stroke without surgery. Knowledge of these factors is important to recommend the best course of action for the individual patient. In this article, we summarize the conclusions of some of the subgroup analyses from the major carotid endarterectomy trials.
尽管20世纪90年代完成的大型随机多中心试验证明了颈动脉内膜切除术的疗效,但治疗颈动脉狭窄患者的医生仍然面临艰难的治疗决策。最近,对参与这些试验的无症状和有症状患者进行了亚组分析,以确定增加手术相关发病率和死亡率的临床和放射学因素,以及增加非手术时中风风险的因素。了解这些因素对于为个体患者推荐最佳治疗方案很重要。在本文中,我们总结了一些主要颈动脉内膜切除术试验的亚组分析结论。