• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口腔癌的细胞学和DNA细胞计量学早期诊断

Cytologic and DNA-cytometric early diagnosis of oral cancer.

作者信息

Remmerbach T W, Weidenbach H, Pomjanski N, Knops K, Mathes S, Hemprich A, Böcking A

机构信息

Department of Oral, Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Nürnberger Strasse 57, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Anal Cell Pathol. 2001;22(4):211-21. doi: 10.1155/2001/807358.

DOI:10.1155/2001/807358
PMID:11564897
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4617997/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this prospective study was to report on the diagnostic accuracy of conventional oral exfoliative cytology taken from white-spotted, ulcerated or other suspicious oral lesions in our clinic. In addition we checked DNA-image cytometry as an adjuvant diagnostic tool. Our hypothesis is that DNA-aneuploidy is a sensitive and specific marker for the early identification of tumor cells in oral brushings.

STUDY DESIGN

251 cytological diagnoses obtained from exfoliative smears of 181 patients from macroscopically suspicious lesions of the oral mucosa and from clinically seemingly benign oral lesions which were excised for establishing histological diagnoses were compared with histological and/or clinical follow-ups of the respective patients. Additionally nuclear DNA-contents were measured after Feulgen restaining using a TV image analysis system.

RESULTS

Sensitivity of our cytological diagnosis on oral smears for the detection of cancer cells was 94.6%, specificity 99.5%, positive predictive value 98.1% and negative predictive value 98.5%. DNA-aneuploidy was assumed if abnormal DNA-stemlines or cells with DNA-content greater 9c were observed. On this basis the prevalence of DNA-aneuploidy in smears of oral squamous cell carcinomas in situ or invasive carcinomas was 96.4%. Sensitivity of DNA-aneuploidy in oral smears for the detection of cancer cells was 96.4%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100% and negative 99.0%. The combination of both techniques increased the sensitivity to 98.2%, specificity to 100%, positive predictive value to 100% and negative to 99.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Brush cytology of all visible oral lesions, if they are clinically considered as suspicious for cancer, are an easily practicable, cheap, non-invasive, painless, safe and accurate screening method for detection of oral precancerous lesions, carcinoma in situ or invasive squamous cell carcinoma in all stages. We conclude that DNA-image cytometry is a very sensitive, highly specific and objective adjuvant tool for the early identification of neoplastic epithelial cells in oral smears.

摘要

目的

本前瞻性研究旨在报告在我们诊所从白斑、溃疡或其他可疑口腔病变采集的传统口腔脱落细胞学检查的诊断准确性。此外,我们检查了DNA图像细胞术作为辅助诊断工具。我们的假设是DNA非整倍性是口腔刷片中肿瘤细胞早期识别的敏感且特异的标志物。

研究设计

将从181例患者口腔黏膜肉眼可疑病变的脱落涂片以及因建立组织学诊断而切除的临床看似良性的口腔病变中获得的251例细胞学诊断结果,与各患者的组织学和/或临床随访结果进行比较。另外,使用电视图像分析系统在福尔根复染后测量核DNA含量。

结果

我们对口腔涂片进行癌细胞检测的细胞学诊断敏感性为94.6%,特异性为99.5%,阳性预测值为98.1%,阴性预测值为98.5%。如果观察到异常DNA干系或DNA含量大于9c的细胞,则判定为DNA非整倍性。在此基础上,原位口腔鳞状细胞癌或浸润性癌涂片的DNA非整倍性患病率为96.4%。口腔涂片DNA非整倍性对癌细胞检测的敏感性为96.4%,特异性为100%,阳性预测值为100%,阴性为99.0%。两种技术联合使用可将敏感性提高到98.2%,特异性提高到100%,阳性预测值提高到100%,阴性提高到99.5%。

结论

对于所有临床上被视为可疑癌变的可见口腔病变进行刷片细胞学检查,是一种易于实施、廉价、非侵入性、无痛、安全且准确的筛查方法,可用于检测各个阶段口癌前病变、原位癌或浸润性鳞状细胞癌。我们得出结论,DNA图像细胞术是一种非常敏感、高度特异且客观的辅助工具,可用于早期识别口腔涂片中的肿瘤上皮细胞。

相似文献

1
Cytologic and DNA-cytometric early diagnosis of oral cancer.口腔癌的细胞学和DNA细胞计量学早期诊断
Anal Cell Pathol. 2001;22(4):211-21. doi: 10.1155/2001/807358.
2
[Noninvasive brush biopsy as an innovative tool for early detection of oral carcinomas].[无创刷检活检作为口腔癌早期检测的创新工具]
Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 2004 Jul;8(4):229-36. doi: 10.1007/s10006-004-0542-z. Epub 2004 Mar 17.
3
[Minimally invasive brush-biopsy: innovative method for early diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma].[微创刷检活检:口腔鳞状细胞癌早期诊断的创新方法]
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2007;117(9):926-40.
4
Diagnostic value of nucleolar organizer regions (AgNORs) in brush biopsies of suspicious lesions of the oral cavity.核仁组成区(AgNORs)在口腔可疑病变刷检活检中的诊断价值
Anal Cell Pathol. 2003;25(3):139-46. doi: 10.1155/2003/647685.
5
Earliest detection of oral cancer using non-invasive brush biopsy including DNA-image-cytometry: report on four cases.使用包括DNA图像细胞术在内的非侵入性刷检活检最早检测口腔癌:4例报告
Anal Cell Pathol. 2003;25(4):159-66. doi: 10.1155/2003/305151.
6
Cytologic and DNA-cytometric very early diagnosis of oral cancer.口腔癌的细胞学及DNA细胞计量学超早期诊断
J Oral Pathol Med. 2004 Aug;33(7):398-404. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2004.0235.x.
7
Cytologic and DNA-cytometric examination of oral lesions in lichen planus.扁平苔藓口腔损害的细胞学及DNA细胞计量学检查
J Oral Pathol Med. 2006 Apr;35(4):227-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2006.00401.x.
8
Evaluation of nuclear morphometry and DNA ploidy status for detection of malignant and premalignant oral lesions: quantitative cytologic assessment and review of methods for cytomorphometric measurements.评估核形态计量学和DNA倍体状态以检测口腔恶性和癌前病变:定量细胞学评估及细胞形态计量测量方法综述
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Apr;64(4):628-35. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.12.010.
9
Verrucous carcinoma of the buccal mucosa: histopathological, cytological and DNA-cytometric features.颊黏膜疣状癌:组织病理学、细胞学及DNA细胞计量学特征
J Oral Pathol Med. 2006 Nov;35(10):633-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2006.00447.x.
10
Cytologic and DNA cytometric diagnosis and therapy monitoring of squamous cell carcinoma in situ and malignant melanoma of the cornea and conjunctiva.角膜和结膜原位鳞状细胞癌及恶性黑色素瘤的细胞学和DNA细胞计量诊断与治疗监测
Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 1999 Oct;21(5):387-96.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantum leap in the diagnosis of oral potentially malignant disorders - A review of literature.口腔潜在恶性疾病诊断的重大进展——文献综述
Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Sep-Dec;15(3):360-366. doi: 10.4103/njms.njms_132_23. Epub 2024 Nov 16.
2
DNA Image Cytometry for Screening the Carcinogenetic Risk of Oral Potential Malignant Disorders.用于筛查口腔潜在恶性疾病致癌风险的DNA图像细胞术
J Cancer. 2024 Jan 1;15(5):1182-1190. doi: 10.7150/jca.91048. eCollection 2024.
3
Assessment of Ploidy Status in Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders - A Systematic Review.口腔潜在恶性疾病中倍体状态的评估——一项系统综述
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023 Jul;15(Suppl 1):S86-S92. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_547_22. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
4
Evaluation of Role of Visual Inspection Using Acetic Acid (VIA) and Exfoliative Cytology in Screening and Early Detection of Oral Premalignant Lesions and Oral Cancer.评估醋酸(VIA)和脱落细胞学检查在筛查和早期发现口腔癌前病变和口腔癌中的作用。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021 Jul 1;22(7):2273-2278. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.7.2273.
5
Diagnostic tests for oral cancer and potentially malignant disorders in patients presenting with clinically evident lesions.对出现临床明显病变的患者进行口腔癌及潜在恶性疾病的诊断测试。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 20;7(7):CD010276. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010276.pub3.
6
Comparison between two cell collecting methods for liquid-based brush biopsies: a consecutive and retrospective study.两种液基毛刷活检细胞采集方法的比较:一项连续的回顾性研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Apr 16;21(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01557-5.
7
Morphometric Analysis of Suprabasal Cell Layer in Oral Epithelial Dysplasia: A Computer-assisted Microscopic Study.口腔上皮发育异常中基底层以上细胞层的形态计量分析:一项计算机辅助显微镜研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2020 Aug;12(Suppl 1):S204-S209. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_60_20. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
8
Clinical comparison of liquid-based and conventional cytology of oral brush biopsies: a randomized controlled trial.液体基和传统细胞学口腔刷活检的临床比较:一项随机对照试验。
Head Face Med. 2018 May 29;14(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13005-018-0166-4.
9
Diagnosis of oral lichen planus from analysis of saliva samples using terahertz time-domain spectroscopy and chemometrics.采用太赫兹时域光谱和化学计量学分析唾液样本诊断口腔扁平苔藓。
J Biomed Opt. 2018 Apr;23(4):1-8. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.23.4.045001.
10
Clinical and cytological study of the oral mucosa of smoking and non-smoking qat chewers in Yemen.也门烟咀嚼者的口腔黏膜的临床和细胞学研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2016 May;20(4):771-9. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1569-2. Epub 2015 Aug 29.