Suppr超能文献

缬沙坦/氢氯噻嗪复方制剂与氨氯地平治疗轻至中度高血压患者的多中心随机双盲研究

A multicenter, randomized double-blind study of valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination versus amlodipine in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

作者信息

Palatini P, Malacco E, Fogari R, Carretta R, Bonaduce D, Bertocchi F, Mann J, Condorelli M

机构信息

Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 2001 Sep;19(9):1691-6. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200109000-00023.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of a once-daily fixed valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) combination and amlodipine in subjects with mild-to-moderate hypertension.

SUBJECTS AND SETTING

In this multicentre, double-blind, randomized, comparative trial, 690 patients with sitting systolic blood pressure (BP) > or = 160 mmHg and sitting diastolic BP > or = 95 mmHg at the end of a 2-week placebo wash-out period were randomized to valsartan-based treatment (n = 342) or amlodipine (n = 348).

METHODS

The patients received valsartan 80 mg o.d. or amlodipine 5 mg o.d for 4 weeks; in the case of an unsatisfactory blood pressure response, the treatments could be respectively changed to the fixed combination of valsartan 80 mg + HCTZ 12.5 mg o.d. or amlodipine 10 mg o.d. for a further 8 weeks.

RESULTS

Both treatment approaches decreased systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure to the same extent. The rate of responders to treatment at the end of fourth week (before up-titration) was 57.4% among the valsartan-treated patients and 61.9% among the amlodipine-treated patients (ns). At the end of the study, the rate of responders was not significantly different between the two groups (74.9 versus 72.1%). Valsartan-based treatment had a slightly lower incidence of adverse events (1.5 versus 5.5%; P = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this trial demonstrate that the valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination and amlodipine are equally effective in lowering BP, and that the combination is better tolerated.

摘要

目的

比较每日一次的缬沙坦/氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)固定复方制剂与氨氯地平对轻至中度高血压患者的降压疗效及耐受性。

受试者与研究环境

在这项多中心、双盲、随机、对照试验中,690例患者在经过2周安慰剂洗脱期后,坐位收缩压(BP)≥160 mmHg且坐位舒张压≥95 mmHg,被随机分为缬沙坦治疗组(n = 342)或氨氯地平治疗组(n = 348)。

方法

患者接受缬沙坦80 mg每日一次或氨氯地平5 mg每日一次治疗4周;若血压控制不佳,治疗可分别改为缬沙坦80 mg + HCTZ 12.5 mg每日一次或氨氯地平10 mg每日一次,再治疗8周。

结果

两种治疗方法降低收缩压和舒张压的程度相同。在第4周结束时(剂量上调前),缬沙坦治疗组的治疗有效率为57.4%,氨氯地平治疗组为61.9%(无统计学差异)。在研究结束时,两组的有效率无显著差异(74.9%对72.1%)。基于缬沙坦的治疗不良事件发生率略低(1.5%对5.5%;P = 0.006)。

结论

该试验结果表明,缬沙坦/氢氯噻嗪复方制剂与氨氯地平在降低血压方面同样有效,且复方制剂耐受性更好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验