• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

姑息治疗的管理策略:提升质量、促进发展与创造机会。

Management strategies for palliative care: promoting quality, growth and opportunity.

作者信息

Herbst L H, Cetti J

机构信息

San Diego Hospice Corporation, San Diego, California, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2001 Sep-Oct;18(5):327-33. doi: 10.1177/104990910101800508.

DOI:10.1177/104990910101800508
PMID:11565186
Abstract

Over 20 years ago, hospice in the United States evolved to provide end-of-life care for terminally ill patients. However, three major barriers exist, which limit access to hospice care. The first two, cultural and regulatory barriers, are not under the direct control of hospices, although programs can be adapted to minimize their influence. The third, management focus, is controlled by hospice programs and has the greatest influence on access to care and quality of care. Under the influence of the Medicare Hospice Benefit and the peer pressure of managed care, many hospice programs use reimbursability as at least one criterion for determination of coverage of services. The fear is that limited reimbursement will cause some services and therapies to bring the programs to financial ruin. This case study shows the outcome of changing management focus away from restrictive policies about therapies and patient selection toward management of productivity and working capital. Some programs have contributed to growth and stability; the revenue thus produced has supported the new innovations. San Diego Hospice is now growing more than 30 percent per year in spite of competition and a fairly flat death rate in the community. This growth is attributed to finding and meeting unmet needs and making all decisions based on the right thing to do. Every staff member understands and supports the mission. The many programs within the agency contribute to fulfillment of the goal to transform end-of-life care. They are presented here as an example of what can be done with mission-based management.

摘要

20多年前,美国的临终关怀机构逐渐发展起来,为晚期绝症患者提供临终关怀服务。然而,存在三大障碍限制了临终关怀服务的可及性。前两个障碍,即文化和监管障碍,虽不受临终关怀机构的直接控制,但机构可通过调整项目来尽量减少其影响。第三个障碍,即管理重点,由临终关怀项目控制,对服务的可及性和护理质量影响最大。在医疗保险临终关怀福利和管理式医疗的同行压力影响下,许多临终关怀项目将可报销性作为确定服务覆盖范围的至少一项标准。人们担心有限的报销会导致一些服务和治疗使项目陷入财务困境。本案例研究展示了将管理重点从对治疗和患者选择的限制性政策转向生产力和营运资金管理的结果。一些项目实现了增长和稳定;由此产生的收入支持了新的创新。尽管存在竞争且社区死亡率相当平稳,但圣地亚哥临终关怀机构目前每年仍以超过30%的速度增长。这种增长归因于发现并满足未被满足的需求,以及基于正确之事做出所有决策。每个工作人员都理解并支持该机构的使命。机构内的众多项目有助于实现转变临终关怀服务的目标。在此将它们作为基于使命的管理所能取得成效的一个例子呈现出来。

相似文献

1
Management strategies for palliative care: promoting quality, growth and opportunity.姑息治疗的管理策略:提升质量、促进发展与创造机会。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2001 Sep-Oct;18(5):327-33. doi: 10.1177/104990910101800508.
2
Hospices' enrollment policies may contribute to underuse of hospice care in the United States.收容所的招生政策可能导致美国收容所护理的使用率低下。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Dec;31(12):2690-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0286.
3
Hospice values, access to services, and the Medicare hospice benefit.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 1992 Nov-Dec;9(6):17-21. doi: 10.1177/104990919200900606.
4
Hospice and palliative care programs.临终关怀与姑息治疗项目。
Prim Care. 2001 Jun;28(2):427-40. doi: 10.1016/s0095-4543(05)70032-4.
5
Ethical dilemmas in hospice and palliative care.临终关怀与姑息治疗中的伦理困境。
Support Care Cancer. 1995 Jan;3(1):28-36. doi: 10.1007/BF00343918.
6
Palliative and end-of-life care: policy analysis.姑息治疗与临终关怀:政策分析
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2003 Jan-Feb;30(1):35-50. doi: 10.1188/03.ONF.35-50.
7
Medicare reimbursement for hospice care: ethical and policy implications of cost-containment strategies.医疗保险对临终关怀的偿付:成本控制策略的伦理与政策影响
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1985 Fall;10(3):565-78. doi: 10.1215/03616878-10-3-565.
8
Hospice Eligibility and Election: Does Policy Prepare Us to Meet the Need?临终关怀资格和选择:政策是否使我们做好了满足需求的准备?
J Aging Soc Policy. 2015 Oct-Dec;27(4):364-80. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2015.1054234.
9
Review of Medicare's proposed hospice eligibility criteria for select noncancer patients.医疗保险针对特定非癌症患者的临终关怀资格标准提案审查。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 1998 May-Jun;15(3):155-8. doi: 10.1177/104990919801500310.
10
Improving the quality of care for terminally ill children.提高对绝症患儿的护理质量。
Healthplan. 2003 Mar-Apr;44(2):38-41.