• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补术可减少伤口并发症。

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair reduces wound complications.

作者信息

Robbins S B, Pofahl W E, Gonzalez R P

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of South Alabama College of Medicine, Mobile 27858, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2001 Sep;67(9):896-900.

PMID:11565772
Abstract

Postoperative wound complications can be a source of significant morbidity after open ventral hernia repair. By using smaller incisions a laparoscopic approach may decrease this complication. To determine the rate of wound complications after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair prospectively collected data on morbidity in 54 consecutive patients undergoing ventral hernia repair were analyzed. Wound complications were classified as major if there was an open wound or treatment with intravenous antibiotics was required. Minor wound complications consisted of wound erythema or drainage that was treated on an outpatient basis. Eighteen patients underwent open ventral hernia repair. Thirty-six patients underwent attempted laparoscopic repair; five required conversion to an open procedure. Wound complications occurred in 28 and 16 per cent of patients undergoing open and successful laparoscopic repairs, respectively. However, only 3 per cent of patients undergoing laparoscopic repair had a major wound complication as compared with 22 per cent of patients undergoing open herniorrhaphy. Two-thirds of the major wound complications in the attempted laparoscopic group occurred in patients requiring conversion to an open procedure. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is a safe and effective alternative to conventional open ventral hernia repair. The main advantage of this minimally invasive approach is a decrease in the rate of major wound complications.

摘要

术后伤口并发症可能是开放性腹疝修补术后显著发病的一个原因。通过采用较小的切口,腹腔镜手术方法可能会减少这种并发症。为了确定腹腔镜腹疝修补术后伤口并发症的发生率,对连续54例接受腹疝修补术患者的前瞻性收集的发病率数据进行了分析。如果存在开放性伤口或需要静脉使用抗生素治疗,则伤口并发症被分类为严重。轻微伤口并发症包括伤口红斑或门诊治疗的引流。18例患者接受了开放性腹疝修补术。36例患者尝试进行腹腔镜修补;5例需要转为开放手术。接受开放性和成功腹腔镜修补术的患者中,伤口并发症分别发生在28%和16%。然而,接受腹腔镜修补术的患者中只有3%发生严重伤口并发症,而接受开放性疝修补术的患者中这一比例为22%。在尝试腹腔镜手术组中,三分之二的严重伤口并发症发生在需要转为开放手术的患者中。腹腔镜腹疝修补术是传统开放性腹疝修补术的一种安全有效的替代方法。这种微创方法的主要优点是严重伤口并发症发生率降低。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair reduces wound complications.腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补术可减少伤口并发症。
Am Surg. 2001 Sep;67(9):896-900.
2
Long-term outcomes in laparoscopic vs open ventral hernia repair.腹腔镜与开放腹疝修补术的长期疗效
Arch Surg. 2007 Jun;142(6):562-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.142.6.562.
3
Comparison of laparoscopic and open ventral herniorrhaphy.腹腔镜与开放性腹疝修补术的比较
Am Surg. 1999 Sep;65(9):827-31; discussion 831-2.
4
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: are there comparative advantages over traditional methods of repair?腹腔镜腹疝修补术:与传统修补方法相比有哪些优势?
Am Surg. 2002 Mar;68(3):291-5; discussion 295-6.
5
Perioperative outcomes and complications of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.腹腔镜腹疝修补术的围手术期结局与并发症
Surgery. 2005 Oct;138(4):708-15; discussion 715-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.06.054.
6
Long-term wound advantages of the laparoscopic approach in rectal cancer.腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌的长期伤口优势
Br J Surg. 2008 Jul;95(7):903-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6134.
7
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: postoperative antibiotics decrease incidence of seroma-related cellulitis.腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补术:术后使用抗生素可降低血清肿相关性蜂窝织炎的发生率。
Am Surg. 2005 Nov;71(11):931-5; discussion 935-6.
8
Surgical treatment of incisional hernia.切口疝的外科治疗
Br J Surg. 2002 May;89(5):534-45. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02083.x.
9
Components separation technique and laparoscopic approach: a review of two evolving strategies for ventral hernia repair.成分分离技术与腹腔镜手术方法:腹疝修补两种不断发展的策略综述
Am Surg. 2005 Jul;71(7):598-605.
10
Comparison of laparoscopic and open repair with mesh for the treatment of ventral incisional hernia: a randomized trial.腹腔镜与开放修补加补片治疗腹直肌切口疝的比较:一项随机试验
Arch Surg. 2010 Apr;145(4):322-8; discussion 328. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.18.

引用本文的文献

1
SAGES guidelines for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.腹腔镜腹疝修补术的SAGES指南。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3163-83. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5072-x. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
2
Outcome of four years experience in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补术四年经验的结果
Pak J Med Sci. 2015 Jul-Aug;31(4):987-90. doi: 10.12669/pjms.314.6326.
3
Impact of pressure and gas type on adhesion formation and biomaterial integration in laparoscopy.压力和气体类型对腹腔镜下粘连形成和生物材料整合的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Nov;25(11):3605-12. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1766-2. Epub 2011 Jun 4.
4
Laparoscopic repair of primary versus incisional ventral hernias: time to recognize the differences?腹腔镜修补原发性与切口疝:是否到了认识差异的时候?
Hernia. 2010 Aug;14(4):383-7. doi: 10.1007/s10029-010-0649-0. Epub 2010 Apr 7.
5
Laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair.腹腔镜切口疝和腹疝修补术。
J Minim Access Surg. 2007 Jul;3(3):83-90. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.37190.
6
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a systematic review.腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补术:一项系统综述
Surg Endosc. 2009 Jan;23(1):4-15. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0182-8. Epub 2008 Oct 15.
7
["Does minimally invasive surgery really imply minimally invasive anaesthesia?"].["微创手术真的意味着微创麻醉吗?"]
Anaesthesist. 2008 Aug;57(8):757-9. doi: 10.1007/s00101-008-1419-6.
8
Open versus laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: something different from a meta-analysis.开放手术与腹腔镜切口疝修补术:荟萃分析之外的不同之处
Surg Endosc. 2008 Oct;22(10):2251-60. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9773-7. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
9
Enterotomy and mortality rates of laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair: a review of the literature.腹腔镜切口疝和腹疝修补术的肠切开术及死亡率:文献综述
JSLS. 2007 Oct-Dec;11(4):408-14.
10
Medical effectiveness and safety of conventional compared to laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: a systematic review.传统开放式与腹腔镜切口疝修补术的医学有效性及安全性:一项系统评价
Surg Endosc. 2007 Dec;21(12):2127-36. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9513-4. Epub 2007 Sep 1.