Redekop G, Marotta T, Weill A
Department of Neurosurgery, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
J Neurosurg. 2001 Sep;95(3):412-9. doi: 10.3171/jns.2001.95.3.0412.
The authors describe their preliminary clinical experience with the use of endovascular stents in the treatment of traumatic vascular lesions of the skull base region. Because adequate distal exposure and direct surgical repair of these lesions are not often possible, conventional treatment has been deliberate arterial occlusion. The purpose of this report is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy as well as limitations of endovascular stent placement in the management of craniocervical arterial injuries.
Six patients with vascular injuries were treated using endovascular stents. There were two arteriovenous fistulas and two pseudoaneurysms of the distal extracranial internal carotid or vertebral arteries resulting from penetrating trauma, and two petrous carotid pseudoaneurysms associated with basal skull fractures. In one patient a porous stent placement procedure was undertaken as well as coil occlusion of an aneurysm, whereas in the remaining five patients covered stent grafts were used as definitive treatment. There were no procedural complications. One patient in whom there was extensive traumatic arterial dissection was found to have asymptomatic stent thrombosis when angiography was repeated 1 week postoperatively. This was the only patient whose associated injuries precluded routine antithrombotic or antiplatelet therapy. Follow-up examinations in the remaining five patients included standard angiography (four patients) or computerized tomography angiography (one patient), which were performed 3 to 6 months postoperatively, and clinical assessments ranging from 3 months to 1 year in duration (mean 9 months). In all five cases the vascular injury was successfully treated and the parent artery remained widely patent. No patient experienced aneurysm recurrence or hemorrhage, and there were no thromboembolic complications.
The authors' experience demonstrates that endovascular treatment of traumatic vascular lesions of the skull base region is both feasible and safe. The advantages of minimally invasive stent placement and parent artery preservation make this procedure for repair of neurovascular injuries a potentially important addition to existing methods.
作者描述了他们使用血管内支架治疗颅底区域创伤性血管病变的初步临床经验。由于这些病变通常无法获得足够的远端暴露并进行直接手术修复,传统治疗方法一直是选择性动脉闭塞。本报告的目的是证明血管内支架置入术在处理颅颈动脉损伤中的安全性、有效性及局限性。
6例血管损伤患者接受了血管内支架治疗。其中有2例动静脉瘘、2例因穿透性创伤导致的颅外颈内动脉或椎动脉远端假性动脉瘤,以及2例与颅底骨折相关的岩骨颈动脉假性动脉瘤。1例患者进行了多孔支架置入术并对动脉瘤进行了弹簧圈栓塞,而其余5例患者使用覆膜支架作为确定性治疗。未发生手术相关并发症。1例存在广泛创伤性动脉夹层的患者在术后1周复查血管造影时发现有无症状的支架血栓形成。这是唯一1例因合并损伤而无法进行常规抗血栓或抗血小板治疗的患者。其余5例患者的随访检查包括术后3至6个月进行的标准血管造影(4例患者)或计算机断层血管造影(1例患者),以及持续3个月至1年(平均9个月)的临床评估。在所有5例病例中,血管损伤均得到成功治疗,供血动脉保持广泛通畅。无患者出现动脉瘤复发或出血,也没有血栓栓塞并发症。
作者的经验表明,血管内治疗颅底区域创伤性血管病变是可行且安全的。微创支架置入术和保留供血动脉的优点使这种修复神经血管损伤的方法成为现有方法中潜在的重要补充。