Suppr超能文献

基于富含P1蛋白的新型酶免疫测定法检测肺炎支原体感染的多中心评估

Multicenter evaluation of the novel enzyme immunoassay based on P1-enriched protein for the detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection.

作者信息

Suni J, Vainionpää R, Tuuminen T

机构信息

Department of Virology, HUCH Laboratory diagnostics, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 3, FIN-00290, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

J Microbiol Methods. 2001 Oct;47(1):65-71. doi: 10.1016/s0167-7012(01)00291-3.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate new Mycoplasma pneumoniae IgG, IgA and IgM EIA methods based on the enrichment of P1-protein (ThermoLabsystems, Helsinki, Finland) (L) for the detection of acute infection. This evaluation was performed in two independent routine clinical microbiology laboratories. The first laboratory used samples preselected by IgG and IgM Platelia enzyme immunoassay (P) and the second used samples preseleced by Serion ELISA Classic M. pneumoniae IgG, IgM (V). The L method was also compared to the FDA approved method of ImmunoWell M. pneumoniae IgG and IgM (G). When the agreement of two methods was applied as a serologic criteria for an acute infection, the following ratios of acute to nonacute infection were calculated 32/86 (totally 118) in the first and 20/72 (totally 92) in the second laboratory. In the first laboratory, the corresponding ratios by methods were 35/83 (sensitivity 100%, specificity 96.5%), 31/87 (sensitivity 97%, specificity 100%), and 55/63 (sensitivity 100%, specificity 79%) for the L, P and G methods, respectively. In the second laboratory, the ratios were 21/71 (sensitivity 100%, specificity 99%), 16/76 (sensitivity 83%, specificity 100%), and 53/39 (sensitivity 100, specificity 69%) for the L, V and G methods, respectively. Taking into account that the tested sample material was preselected by the P and V methods, which may have introduced some bias in their favor, the newly developed L method utilizing P1-enriched protein was found reliable for serodiagnosis of acute M. pneumoniae infection. The method G was the least specific in detection of acute infection.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估基于P1蛋白富集(芬兰赫尔辛基的ThermoLabsystems公司)的新型肺炎支原体IgG、IgA和IgM酶免疫分析方法(L)用于检测急性感染。该评估在两个独立的常规临床微生物实验室进行。第一个实验室使用经IgG和IgM Platelia酶免疫分析(P)预选的样本,第二个实验室使用经Serion ELISA Classic肺炎支原体IgG、IgM(V)预选的样本。L方法还与美国食品药品监督管理局批准的ImmunoWell肺炎支原体IgG和IgM方法(G)进行了比较。当将两种方法的一致性用作急性感染的血清学标准时,在第一个实验室计算出急性感染与非急性感染的比例为32/86(共118例),在第二个实验室为20/72(共92例)。在第一个实验室中,L、P和G方法对应的比例分别为35/83(敏感性100%,特异性96.5%)、31/87(敏感性97%,特异性100%)和55/63(敏感性100%,特异性79%)。在第二个实验室中,L、V和G方法的比例分别为21/71(敏感性100%,特异性99%)、16/76(敏感性83%,特异性100%)和53/39(敏感性100%,特异性69%)。考虑到测试样本材料是通过P和V方法预选的,这可能对其有利地引入了一些偏差,利用P1富集蛋白的新开发的L方法被发现对于急性肺炎支原体感染的血清学诊断是可靠的。方法G在检测急性感染方面特异性最低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验