Chovanec M, Cedervall B, Kolman A
Department of Molecular Genetics, Cancer Research Institute, Vlárska 7, 833 91 37, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Chem Biol Interact. 2001 Sep 28;137(3):259-68. doi: 10.1016/s0009-2797(01)00258-7.
To estimate the effects of interaction of gamma-rays and an epoxide, cell survival and induction of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) following combined exposure to ionizing radiation and ethylene oxide (EtO) or propylene oxide (PO) were studied in human fibroblasts. Two treatment protocols were applied: (a) the cells were pre-exposed to different doses of gamma-rays and then treated with epoxide, and (b) the cells were pretreated with epoxide and then exposed to different doses of gamma-rays. Here we show that order of the treatment did not play a role in cell survival and that the effect of combined exposure on cell killing was additive for both epoxides. As to DNA DSBs induction, however, a difference dependent upon the order of the treatment was observed. While EtO or PO treatment followed by gamma-rays exposure led to an increased number of DSBs at higher gamma-ray doses (2-3 Gy), no significant increase of DSBs was detected after the opposite order of the treatment (gamma-ray exposure followed by EtO or PO treatment).
为了评估γ射线与环氧化物相互作用的影响,我们在人成纤维细胞中研究了联合暴露于电离辐射与环氧乙烷(EtO)或环氧丙烷(PO)后细胞的存活率以及DNA双链断裂(DSB)的诱导情况。应用了两种处理方案:(a)细胞先暴露于不同剂量的γ射线,然后用环氧化物处理;(b)细胞先用环氧化物预处理,然后暴露于不同剂量的γ射线。我们在此表明,处理顺序对细胞存活没有影响,并且联合暴露对细胞杀伤的作用对于两种环氧化物都是相加的。然而,对于DNA DSB的诱导,观察到了取决于处理顺序的差异。当先进行EtO或PO处理再进行γ射线暴露时,在较高γ射线剂量(2 - 3 Gy)下DSB的数量增加,而在相反的处理顺序(先进行γ射线暴露再进行EtO或PO处理)后未检测到DSB有显著增加。