Hogg J, Evans P L
Br J Psychol. 1975 May;66(2):211-24. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1975.tb01457.x.
The use of discrimination learning paradigms in the study of attentional transfer is discussed. The technique of go/no-go discrimination learning followed by stimulus generalization testing is contrasted with the more familiar simultaneous learning paradigm followed by a shift in the relevant cues. In the former paradigm the effect of training a discrimination on one dimension on the slope of the stimulus generalization gradient on an independent gradient dimension (extra-dimensional training) is assessed. A steepening of the gradient relative to appropriate control procedures is taken as evidence of positive attentional transfer. The relevance of the technique to the detailed study of attentional transfer in educationally subnormal (severely) (ESN(S)) children is considered. In Expt. I nine ESN(S) children were trained in a go/no-go discrimination involving stimuli differing in orientation, and were generalization tested on a dimension that was orthogonal, namely hue. Of the six subjects who learnt the discrimination five showed clear decremental gradients on the hue dimension. In contrast a Pseudo-Discrimination group (PD) of eight subjects matched to those in the TD group showed no gradients. These subjects were not trained in the orientation discrimination, but were reinforced for responding on 50 per cent of each of the S+ and S- stimulus presentations. They thus received equal exposure to, but no differential training on, the orientation dimension. An S+ only group of four subjects who received no exposure to the orientation stimuli showed no gradients when stimulus generalization testing on the hue continuum was carried out. The result is discussed in terms of transfer deriving from stimulus control by relational aspects of the stimuli; in terms of control by constant irrelevant stimuli; and in terms of the study of stimulus control in ESN(S) children. In Expt. II the influence of the codability of the colours on the location of the peak of the stimulus generalization gradients in the TD group is investigated.
本文讨论了辨别学习范式在注意力转移研究中的应用。“是/否”辨别学习技术随后进行刺激泛化测试,与更为常见的同时学习范式随后改变相关线索形成对比。在前一种范式中,评估在一个维度上训练辨别对独立梯度维度(维度外训练)上刺激泛化梯度斜率的影响。相对于适当的控制程序,梯度变陡被视为积极注意力转移的证据。该技术与对教育程度低常(严重)(ESN(S))儿童注意力转移的详细研究的相关性也得到了考虑。在实验一中,九名ESN(S)儿童接受了涉及方向不同刺激的“是/否”辨别训练,并在正交维度即色调上进行了泛化测试。在学会辨别的六名受试者中,有五名在色调维度上显示出明显的递减梯度。相比之下,与TD组受试者匹配的八名受试者组成的伪辨别组(PD)没有显示出梯度。这些受试者没有接受方向辨别训练,而是在S+和S-刺激呈现的每一个的50%上因做出反应而得到强化。因此,他们在方向维度上接受了相同的暴露,但没有接受差异训练。仅接受S+刺激的四名受试者组成的组没有接触方向刺激,在对色调连续体进行刺激泛化测试时没有显示出梯度。结果从刺激关系方面的刺激控制所产生的转移、恒定无关刺激的控制以及ESN(S)儿童的刺激控制研究等方面进行了讨论。在实验二中,研究了颜色的可编码性对TD组刺激泛化梯度峰值位置的影响。