Suppr超能文献

手术与注射治疗鞘膜积液和附睾囊肿的结果比较。

Comparison of results of treatment of hydrocele and epididymal cysts by surgery and injection.

作者信息

Moloney G E

出版信息

Br Med J. 1975 Aug 23;3(5981):478-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.3.5981.478.

Abstract

A comparison has been made between a series of hydroceles and cysts of epididymis treated by surgery with a complication rate of at least 17% haematoma and 10% sepsis, an average hospital stay of five days, and a much longer time off work, and a series treated by tapping and injection (described in detail) requiring one to three visits to outpatients, an almost negligible complication rate, and no failures in those completing treatment.

摘要

对一系列接受手术治疗的鞘膜积液和附睾囊肿与另一系列接受穿刺和注射治疗(详细描述)的病例进行了比较。手术治疗的并发症发生率至少为17%的血肿和10%的脓毒症,平均住院时间为五天,误工时间更长;而穿刺和注射治疗只需到门诊就诊一至三次,并发症发生率几乎可忽略不计,完成治疗的患者无一失败。

相似文献

2
Sclerosant therapy for hydroceles and epididymal cysts.鞘膜积液和附睾囊肿的硬化剂治疗
Br J Urol. 1983 Feb;55(1):81-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1983.tb07085.x.
9
Sclerosant treatment for hydroceles and epididymal cysts.鞘膜积液和附睾囊肿的硬化剂治疗。
Br Med J. 1980 Jan 19;280(6208):182-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.280.6208.182-b.

引用本文的文献

4
Comparison of outcomes and costs of surgery versus sclerotherapy to treat hydrocele.比较手术与硬化疗法治疗鞘膜积液的结局和成本。
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2021 Jul 16;19:eGS5920. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2021GS5920. eCollection 2021.
5
Aspiration and sclerotherapy versus hydrocoelectomy for treating hydrocoeles.抽吸硬化疗法与鞘膜切除术治疗鞘膜积液的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 13;2014(11):CD009735. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009735.pub2.
7
9
Sclerosant treatment for hydroceles and epididymal cysts.鞘膜积液和附睾囊肿的硬化剂治疗。
Br Med J. 1980 Jan 19;280(6208):182-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.280.6208.182-b.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验