Kertesz T R, Shelton C, Wiggins R H, Salzman K L, Glastonbury C M, Harnsberger R
Department of Otolaryngology, University of Utah Medical School, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132, USA.
Laryngoscope. 2001 Jul;111(7):1250-6. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200107000-00020.
To present the imaging findings and anatomical locations of a series of 88 facial nerve neuromas from two centers over a 30-year period. We describe the salient radiological features of neuromas in each anatomical location and outline the ways in which modern imaging techniques have altered our perception of this entity.
A retrospective review of tumors presenting to two tertiary care referral institutions since 1970.
The charts and available imaging of patients with the diagnosis of facial neuroma were reviewed. These patients presented to the House Ear Clinic between 1970 and 1994 and to the University of Utah Medical Center (Salt Lake City, UT) between 1986 and August 2000. We examined anatomical location to determine patterns of tumor presentation and compared the findings before and after the era of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
All segments of the facial nerve were represented. Overall, multiple-segment tumors were almost twice as common (63.6%) as single-segment tumors (36.4%). Before the advent of MRI, all segments of the nerve from the cerebellopontine angle to the tympanic portion were almost equally represented (29.5%-36.3%). After MRI, the geniculate ganglion (68.2%) and labyrinthine portion (52.3%) were by far the most commonly affected areas. Before MRI, there were, on average, 1.89 segments involved per tumor. After MRI, this average number increased to 2.57 segments per tumor. Radiologically, the high-resolution computed tomography and MRI features cannot be generalized. Rather, the imaging features depend on which segments are involved. This is because of the variation in the surrounding anatomical landscape of the facial nerve in its course through the temporal bone.
The more sensitive imaging provided by newer radiological techniques has altered our perception of facial neuroma. It has provided us with an increased ability to diagnose and fully evaluate this neoplasm preoperatively, allowing improved patient counseling and surgical planning.
呈现来自两个中心的一系列88例面神经神经瘤在30年期间的影像学表现及解剖位置。我们描述了每个解剖位置神经瘤的显著放射学特征,并概述了现代成像技术改变我们对该实体认识的方式。
对自1970年以来在两个三级医疗转诊机构就诊的肿瘤进行回顾性研究。
对诊断为面神经神经瘤患者的病历及现有影像学资料进行回顾。这些患者于1970年至1994年在豪斯耳科诊所就诊,于1986年至2000年8月在犹他大学医学中心(盐湖城,犹他州)就诊。我们检查解剖位置以确定肿瘤的表现模式,并比较磁共振成像(MRI)时代前后的结果。
面神经的所有节段均有累及。总体而言,多节段肿瘤(63.6%)几乎是单节段肿瘤(36.4%)的两倍。在MRI出现之前,从桥小脑角到鼓室段的神经各节段受累情况几乎相同(29.5% - 36.3%)。MRI出现后,膝状神经节(68.2%)和迷路段(52.3%)是迄今为止最常受累的区域。在MRI出现之前,每个肿瘤平均累及1.89个节段。MRI出现后,每个肿瘤的平均节段数增加到2.57个。在放射学上,高分辨率计算机断层扫描和MRI特征不能一概而论。相反,成像特征取决于受累的节段。这是因为面神经在穿过颞骨的过程中其周围解剖结构存在差异。
更新的放射学技术提供的更敏感成像改变了我们对面神经瘤的认识。它使我们在术前诊断和全面评估这种肿瘤的能力有所提高,从而改善患者咨询和手术规划。