Radder C M, Brand A, Kanhai H H
Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics, The Netherlands.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Sep;185(3):683-8. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.116727.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a less invasive treatment strategy results in a higher platelet count of the neonate and prevents intracranial hemorrhage in pregnant women who are at risk for fetal or neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia.
Between March 1989 and August 2000, 48 women with 56 pregnancies were treated. The population was divided into groups. A diagnostic fetal blood sample was taken in 7 cases that had a history of a sibling with an intracranial hemorrhage (group I; n = 8); treatment was provided, when necessary, with platelet transfusions and maternal administration of immunoglobulin. The other 48 cases, with a history of a sibling with severe thrombocytopenia but without intracranial hemorrhage, were retrospectively divided into group IIa (n = 16) and IIb (n = 32). In group IIa, at least 2 diagnostic fetal blood samples were taken, and when necessary, intrauterine platelet transfusion and immunoglobulin were administered (invasive treatment). In group IIb, no initial diagnostic fetal blood sampling was performed (noninvasive treatment). In 23 cases, immunoglobulin was administered, which was followed by predelivery fetal blood sampling in 8 cases. In 9 cases, only predelivery fetal blood sampling was performed, when necessary, followed by intrauterine platelet transfusion.
Results of our noninvasive treatment strategy were comparable to results of the invasive method in the prevention of intracranial hemorrhage (intracranial hemorrhage was not observed). In addition, there was an increasing trend in median platelet count and a lower number of cases with severe thrombocytopenia (<50 x 10(9)/L) in the noninvasive compared with the invasive treatment group (median platelet count, 92 and 31 x 10(9)/L, respectively).
Our results indicate that a less invasive treatment strategy in patients who are at risk for fetal or neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia and who have no history of a previous child who was affected with intracranial hemorrhage seems justified.
本研究旨在评估一种侵入性较小的治疗策略是否能使新生儿血小板计数升高,并预防有胎儿或新生儿同种免疫性血小板减少症风险的孕妇发生颅内出血。
1989年3月至2000年8月期间,对48名孕妇的56次妊娠进行了治疗。将人群分为几组。7例有同胞患颅内出血病史的孕妇接受了诊断性胎儿血样采集(I组;n = 8);必要时给予血小板输注和母体免疫球蛋白治疗。另外48例有同胞患严重血小板减少症但无颅内出血病史的孕妇,回顾性分为IIa组(n = 16)和IIb组(n = 32)。IIa组至少采集2次诊断性胎儿血样,必要时给予宫内血小板输注和免疫球蛋白(侵入性治疗)。IIb组未进行初始诊断性胎儿血样采集(非侵入性治疗)。23例孕妇给予了免疫球蛋白治疗,其中8例在分娩前进行了胎儿血样采集。9例仅在必要时进行了分娩前胎儿血样采集,随后进行宫内血小板输注。
我们的非侵入性治疗策略在预防颅内出血方面的结果与侵入性方法相当(未观察到颅内出血)。此外,与侵入性治疗组相比,非侵入性治疗组的血小板计数中位数有上升趋势,严重血小板减少症(<50×10⁹/L)的病例数较少(血小板计数中位数分别为92和31×10⁹/L)。
我们的结果表明,对于有胎儿或新生儿同种免疫性血小板减少症风险且无先前子女患颅内出血病史的患者,采用侵入性较小的治疗策略似乎是合理的。