Zahner S J
University of Wisconsin-Madison, H6/252 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792-2455, USA.
Manag Care. 2001 Sep;10(9):47-52.
This evaluation research project was conducted to describe local perspectives on creating and implementing mandated memoranda of understanding (MOU) between Medicaid managed care organizations and local health departments (LHD), to provide insights into the strengths and limitations of MOU, and to share information on their use as tools for interorganizational service coordination.
A cross-sectional, qualitative and quantitative, self-administered, mailback survey was conducted with employees of MCOs and LHDs in California having experience in creating and/or implementing state-mandated MOU in nine service areas. Descriptive and qualitative results are reported.
The creation of MOU was facilitated by supportive leadership, previous collaborative experience, and the state mandate. The majority of respondents believed the MOU worked well to achieve coordination of services. MOU strengths and limitations were identified. The MOU were reported to have contributed to an increase in participation in four of six types of collaborative activities. Perceived quality of health care services for Medicaid participants improved with the MOU, but no impact on quality of public health services was reported. A majority (78 percent) supported a continuation of the mandated policy. Some organizations reported expanding the use of MOU beyond mandated areas.
Study respondents held generally positive perceptions of the strengths of MOU and supported continuation of the mandated MOU policy in California. Their experience demonstrates a capacity for MCOs and LHDs to work together on health care coordination issues despite the difficulties inherent in interorganizational collaboration.
开展本评估研究项目,以描述地方对于医疗补助管理式医疗组织与地方卫生部门(LHD)之间创建和实施强制谅解备忘录(MOU)的看法,深入了解谅解备忘录的优势和局限性,并分享有关其作为组织间服务协调工具使用情况的信息。
对加利福尼亚州医疗补助管理式医疗组织(MCO)和地方卫生部门(LHD)中在九个服务领域有创建和/或实施州强制谅解备忘录经验的员工进行了一项横断面、定性和定量的自填式回邮调查。报告了描述性和定性结果。
支持性领导、先前的合作经验和州强制规定促进了谅解备忘录的创建。大多数受访者认为谅解备忘录在实现服务协调方面运作良好。确定了谅解备忘录的优势和局限性。据报告,谅解备忘录促使六种合作活动中的四种参与度有所提高。谅解备忘录使医疗补助参与者对医疗服务的感知质量有所改善,但未报告对公共卫生服务质量有影响。大多数人(78%)支持继续执行强制政策。一些组织报告称,在强制规定范围之外扩大了谅解备忘录的使用。
研究受访者对谅解备忘录的优势普遍持积极看法,并支持在加利福尼亚州继续执行强制谅解备忘录政策。他们的经验表明,尽管组织间合作存在固有困难,但医疗补助管理式医疗组织和地方卫生部门有能力共同解决医疗协调问题。