Suppr超能文献

模拟牙髓压力下与牙本质两种不同表面的粘结强度

Bonding strength to two different surfaces of dentin under simulated pulpal pressure.

作者信息

Belli S, Unlü N, Ozer F

机构信息

Department of Operative Dentistry, Selçuk University, School of Dentistry, Campus, Konya, Turkey.

出版信息

J Adhes Dent. 2001 Summer;3(2):145-52.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to measure and compare the in vitro shear bond strengths (SBS) of the following dentin bonding systems to different dentin surfaces under simulated pulpal pressure: Liner Bond 2 (self-etching) (LB2), Liner Bond 2V (self-etching) (LB2V), Opti Bond Solo (single component) (OBS), Fuji Bond LC (filled) (FBLC), Prime & Bond 2-1 (single component) (P&B2-1), and Solid Bond (total etching) (SB).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Occlusal and buccal surfaces of 60 extracted human molars were prepared to expose the dentin bonding surface. After being wet ground with 600-grit abrasive papers, teeth were randomly assigned to 6 equal groups of 10 each. The dentin surfaces were treated with the bonding systems mentioned above, and resin composite cylinders (Clearfil AP-X) were built up under simulated pulpal pressure when diluted bovine serum was used as the pulpal fluid. After one day of storage in 37 degrees C water, the specimens were shear tested to failure on an Instron machine.

RESULTS

The data were statistically analyzed with the Student's t-test and a post hoc Tukey test. Comparing buccal surfaces, the post hoc Tukey test indicated no significant differences among all the test groups (p > 0.05). On occlusal surfaces, the post hoc Tukey test indicated significant differences among the tested groups (p < 0.05). The Student's t test revealed significant differences between the occlusal and buccal shear bond strength values in LB 2, LB2V, and SB groups (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The strength of adhesion to dentin depends upon both the adhesive system used - with self-etching systems tending to show higher bond strengths than the other materials tested - and the location of the dentin, with significantly higher SBS being found on buccal surfaces in 3 of the 7 tested bonding systems.

摘要

目的

本体外研究的目的是在模拟牙髓压力下,测量并比较以下牙本质粘结系统与不同牙本质表面的体外剪切粘结强度(SBS):Liner Bond 2(自酸蚀)(LB2)、Liner Bond 2V(自酸蚀)(LB2V)、Opti Bond Solo(单组分)(OBS)、Fuji Bond LC(含填料)(FBLC)、Prime & Bond 2 - 1(单组分)(P&B2 - 1)以及Solid Bond(全酸蚀)(SB)。

材料与方法

制备60颗拔除的人类磨牙的咬合面和颊面,以暴露牙本质粘结表面。用600目砂纸湿磨后,将牙齿随机分为6组,每组10颗。用上述粘结系统处理牙本质表面,当使用稀释的牛血清作为牙髓液时,在模拟牙髓压力下堆积树脂复合体圆柱体(Clearfil AP - X)。在37℃水中储存一天后,在Instron机器上对标本进行剪切测试直至破坏。

结果

数据采用Student's t检验和事后Tukey检验进行统计学分析。比较颊面时,事后Tukey检验表明所有测试组之间无显著差异(p > 0.05)。在咬合面上,事后Tukey检验表明测试组之间存在显著差异(p < 0.05)。Student's t检验显示,LB 2、LB2V和SB组的咬合面和颊面剪切粘结强度值之间存在显著差异(p < 0.05)。

结论

与牙本质的粘结强度既取决于所使用的粘结系统——自酸蚀系统往往比其他测试材料表现出更高的粘结强度——也取决于牙本质的位置,在7种测试粘结系统中的3种中,颊面的SBS显著更高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验