Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001 Oct;98(2):177-85. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(01)00331-1.
To compare the efficacy and safety of atosiban and salbutamol in the treatment of preterm labor.
A multicenter, double-blind, double-placebo, randomized, controlled trial. Women (n=241) diagnosed with preterm labor at 23-33 gestational weeks were enrolled and received either atosiban (n=119) or salbutamol (n=122). At randomization, women were stratified by gestational age (< or =28 weeks and >28 weeks). Atosiban (i.v. bolus dose of 6.75 mg, then 300 microg/min for 3h and 100 microg/min for up to 48h) and salbutamol (2.5-45 microg/min) were administered by i.v. infusion for up to 48h. Retreatment with study drug or an alternative tocolytic agent was allowed. Main outcome measures included tocolytic effectiveness which was assessed in terms of the number of women undelivered after 48h and 7 days. Tocolytic efficacy and tolerability were assessed in terms of the proportion of women undelivered and who did not require alternative tocolytic therapy at 48h and 7 days of starting treatment. Safety was assessed in terms of maternal side effects and neonatal morbidity.
Tocolytic effectiveness at 48h was 93.3 versus 95.0% (P=0.67) and after 7 days was 89.9 versus 90.1% (P=0.93) in the atosiban and salbutamol groups, respectively. Tocolytic efficacy and tolerability within 48h was 79.8 versus 75.2% (P=0.15), and after 7 days was 58.8 versus 46.3% (P=0.021) in the atosiban and salbutamol groups, respectively. Maternal adverse events, including serious events, occurred more frequently in the salbutamol group. Neonatal outcomes were comparable between the study groups.
The oxytocin antagonist atosiban was found to be better tolerated by both mother and fetus than salbutamol, with a comparable neonatal and infant safety profile, and atosiban was as effective as salbutamol in delaying threatened preterm birth. This study supports the clinical use of atosiban in the treatment of preterm labor.
比较阿托西班与沙丁胺醇治疗早产的疗效和安全性。
一项多中心、双盲、双安慰剂、随机对照试验。纳入241名在孕23 - 33周被诊断为早产的女性,她们被随机分为阿托西班组(n = 119)或沙丁胺醇组(n = 122)。随机分组时,女性按孕周(≤28周和>28周)分层。阿托西班(静脉推注剂量6.75 mg,然后300 μg/min持续3小时,100 μg/min持续至48小时)和沙丁胺醇(2.5 - 45 μg/min)通过静脉输注给药,持续48小时。允许使用研究药物或替代宫缩抑制剂进行再次治疗。主要结局指标包括宫缩抑制有效性,通过48小时和7天后未分娩的女性人数进行评估。宫缩抑制疗效和耐受性通过开始治疗48小时和7天时未分娩且不需要替代宫缩抑制剂治疗的女性比例进行评估。安全性通过母体副作用和新生儿发病率进行评估。
阿托西班组和沙丁胺醇组在48小时时的宫缩抑制有效性分别为93.3%和95.0%(P = 0.67),7天后分别为89.9%和90.1%(P = 0.93)。阿托西班组和沙丁胺醇组在48小时内的宫缩抑制疗效和耐受性分别为79.8%和75.2%(P = 0.15),7天后分别为58.8%和46.3%(P = 0.021)。包括严重事件在内的母体不良事件在沙丁胺醇组中更频繁发生。研究组之间的新生儿结局相当。
发现催产素拮抗剂阿托西班在母亲和胎儿中的耐受性均优于沙丁胺醇,具有相当的新生儿和婴儿安全性,且阿托西班在延迟先兆早产方面与沙丁胺醇效果相当。本研究支持阿托西班在早产治疗中的临床应用。