BJOG. 2001 Feb;108(2):133-42.
To compare the effectiveness and safety of the oxytocin antagonist atosiban with conventional beta-adrenergic agonist (beta-agonist) therapy in the treatment of preterm labour.
Three multinational, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled trials. Setting Hospitals in Australia, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Israel, Sweden, and the UK.
Women diagnosed with preterm labour at 23-33 completed weeks of gestation.
Seven hundred and forty-two women were randomised; 733 received atosiban (n = 363; intravenous (iv) bolus dose of 6.75 mg, then 300 microg/minute iv. for 3h and 100 microg/min iv thereafter) or beta-agonist (n = 379; ritodrine, salbutamol or terbutaline iv; dose titrated) for at least 18h and up to 48 hours. Uterine contraction rate, cervical dilatation and effacement were used to assess progression of labour. An all patients treated analysis, using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, was performed.
Tocolytic effectiveness was assessed in terms of the number of women undelivered after 48 hours and seven days. Safety was assessed in terms of maternal side effects and neonatal morbidity.
There were no significant differences between atosiban and beta-agonists in delaying delivery for 48h (88.1% vs 88.9%; P = 0.99) or seven days (79.7% versus 77.6%; P = 0.28). Tocolytic effectiveness was also similar in terms of mean [SD] gestational age at delivery (35.8 [3.9] weeks vs 35.5 [4.1] weeks) and mean [SD] birthweight (2,491 [813] g versus 2,461 [831] g). Maternal side effects, particularly cardiovascular adverse events (8.3% vs 81.2%, P < 0.001), were reported more frequently in women given beta-agonists, resulting in more treatment discontinuations due to side effects (1.1% vs 15.4%, P = 0.0001). No statistical differences in neonatal/infant outcomes were observed with either study medication.
In the largest study of tocolytic therapy to date, atosiban was comparable in clinical effectiveness to conventional beta-agonist therapy, but was associated with fewer maternal cardiovascular side effects. We conclude that atosiban has clinical advantages over current tocolytic therapy.
比较缩宫素拮抗剂阿托西班与传统β-肾上腺素能激动剂(β-激动剂)治疗早产的有效性和安全性。
三项跨国、多中心、双盲、随机对照试验。地点:澳大利亚、加拿大、捷克共和国、丹麦、法国、以色列、瑞典和英国的医院。
妊娠23 - 33足周被诊断为早产的妇女。
742名妇女被随机分组;733名接受阿托西班治疗(n = 363;静脉推注剂量6.75 mg,然后以300 μg/分钟静脉滴注3小时,之后以100 μg/分钟静脉滴注)或β-激动剂治疗(n = 379;利托君、沙丁胺醇或特布他林静脉滴注;剂量滴定)至少18小时,最长48小时。子宫收缩率、宫颈扩张和消退情况用于评估产程进展。采用 Cochr an - Mantel - Haenszel检验进行全患者治疗分析。
根据48小时和7天后未分娩的妇女数量评估宫缩抑制有效性。根据母体副作用和新生儿发病率评估安全性。
阿托西班与β-激动剂在延迟分娩48小时(88.1%对88.9%;P = 0.99)或7天(79.7%对77.6%;P = 0.28)方面无显著差异。在分娩时的平均[标准差]孕周(35.8 [3.9]周对35.5 [4.1]周)和平均[标准差]出生体重(2491 [813] g对2461 [831] g)方面,宫缩抑制有效性也相似。接受β-激动剂治疗的妇女报告的母体副作用,尤其是心血管不良事件(8.3%对81.2%,P < 0.001)更频繁,导致因副作用而停药的情况更多(1.1%对15.4%,P = 0.0001)。两种研究药物在新生儿/婴儿结局方面均未观察到统计学差异。
在迄今为止最大规模的宫缩抑制治疗研究中,阿托西班在临床有效性上与传统β-激动剂治疗相当,但母体心血管副作用较少。我们得出结论,阿托西班相对于目前的宫缩抑制治疗具有临床优势。