• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单胎足月臀位分娩中计划阴道分娩与选择性剖宫产的比较:1116例病例研究

Planned vaginal delivery versus elective caesarean section in singleton term breech presentation: a study of 1116 cases.

作者信息

Golfier F, Vaudoyer F, Ecochard R, Champion F, Audra P, Raudrant D

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Claude Bernard University, Hôtel Dieu Hospital, School of Medicine, Lyon, France.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001 Oct;98(2):186-92. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(01)00333-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0301-2115(01)00333-5
PMID:11574129
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare neonatal and maternal morbidity and mortality between planned vaginal delivery and elective cesarean section for singleton term breech presentation.

STUDY DESIGN

We studied retrospectively all deliveries of singleton breech presentations at term in the public Hospitals of Lyon between 1 January 1991 and 31 December 1995. To take only the effect of delivery on the fetus into account, we eliminated high risk pregnancies and fetal malformations. Fetal parameters were corrected perinatal mortality, Apgar score<7 at 1 and 5 min, umbilical cord arterial pH<7.15, neurological disorders, trauma and need for neonatal intensive care. Maternal parameters were mild, moderate and severe complications.

RESULTS

Of the 1116 breech presentations, 702 (62.9%) underwent an elective caesarean section and 414 (37.1%) a planned vaginal delivery. In the latter group, 342 (30.6%) had a vaginal delivery and 72 (6.5%) a non-elective caesarean section. Infants for whom the vaginal route was planned were at higher risk of mortality and morbidity. There were 2 deaths in this group and none in the elective caesarean section group and all fetal parameters were poorer: more Apgar<7 at 5 min (RR: relative risk=3.05; 1.03-9.05), arterial pH<7.15 (RR=1.64; 1.11-2.43), intubations (RR=7.35; 2.10-25.6), neurological disorders, trauma (RR=4.24; 1.66-10.8), transfer to intensive care units (RR=3.23; 1.57-6.64). The overall maternal morbidity was lower in the planned vaginal delivery group (RR=0.65; 0.44-0.94) but this was only because of less mild complications. The moderate and severe complications were the same in the two groups (RR=0.97; 0.59-1.57).

CONCLUSIONS

Planned vaginal delivery in singleton term breech presentation increases the risk of death and of neonatal complications. Elective caesarean section increases the risk of only mild maternal complications. For these reasons, elective caesarean section should be preferred for singleton term breech presentations.

摘要

目的

比较单胎足月臀位计划性阴道分娩与选择性剖宫产的新生儿及产妇发病率和死亡率。

研究设计

我们回顾性研究了1991年1月1日至1995年12月31日期间里昂公立医院所有单胎足月臀位分娩情况。为仅考虑分娩对胎儿的影响,我们排除了高危妊娠和胎儿畸形。胎儿参数为校正围产儿死亡率、1分钟和5分钟时阿氏评分<7分、脐动脉pH<7.15、神经系统疾病、创伤以及新生儿重症监护需求。产妇参数为轻度、中度和重度并发症。

结果

在1116例臀位分娩中,702例(62.9%)接受了选择性剖宫产,414例(37.1%)为计划性阴道分娩。在后一组中,342例(30.6%)经阴道分娩,72例(6.5%)接受了非选择性剖宫产。计划经阴道分娩的婴儿死亡和发病风险更高。该组有2例死亡,选择性剖宫产组无死亡,且所有胎儿参数均较差:5分钟时更多阿氏评分<7分(RR:相对风险=3.05;1.03 - 9.05)、动脉pH<7.(RR=1.64;1.11 - 2.43)、插管(RR=7.35;2.10 - 25.6)、神经系统疾病、创伤(RR=4.24;1.66 - 10.8)、转入重症监护病房(RR=3.23;1.57 - 6.64)。计划性阴道分娩组的总体产妇发病率较低(RR=0.65;0.44 - 0.94),但这仅因轻度并发症较少。两组的中度和重度并发症相同(RR=0.97;0.59 - 1.57)。

结论

单胎足月臀位计划性阴道分娩会增加死亡和新生儿并发症风险。选择性剖宫产仅增加轻度产妇并发症风险。基于这些原因,单胎足月臀位应首选选择性剖宫产。

相似文献

1
Planned vaginal delivery versus elective caesarean section in singleton term breech presentation: a study of 1116 cases.单胎足月臀位分娩中计划阴道分娩与选择性剖宫产的比较:1116例病例研究
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001 Oct;98(2):186-92. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(01)00333-5.
2
Planned vaginal delivery versus elective caesarean section: a study of 705 singleton term breech presentations.计划阴道分娩与选择性剖宫产:705例单胎足月臀位分娩的研究
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Jul;105(7):710-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10200.x.
3
Vaginal delivery of breech presentation.臀位的阴道分娩
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009 Jun;31(6):557-566. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34221-9.
4
Vaginal breech delivery: results of a prospective registration study.阴道臀位分娩:一项前瞻性登记研究的结果
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Jul 24;13:153. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-153.
5
[Breech delivery and scarred uterus: a special obstetrical situation?].[臀位分娩与瘢痕子宫:一种特殊的产科情况?]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2013 Jun;42(4):351-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.10.013. Epub 2013 Mar 1.
6
Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery.足月臀位分娩计划剖宫产。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 21;2015(7):CD000166. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000166.pub2.
7
The risks of planned vaginal breech delivery versus planned caesarean section for term breech birth: a meta-analysis including observational studies.计划性阴道臀位分娩与择期剖宫产术用于足月臀位分娩的风险:一项包含观察性研究的荟萃分析。
BJOG. 2016 Jan;123(1):49-57. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13524. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
8
Outcomes of breech birth by mode of delivery: a population linkage study.臀位分娩方式的结局:一项人群关联研究。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Oct;56(5):453-459. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12488. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
9
Comparison of maternal and perinatal morbidity between elective and emergency caesarean section in singleton-term breech presentation.择期与急症剖宫产在单胎足月臀位分娩中母婴发病率的比较。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 May;40(4):500-506. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1634018. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
10
Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group.足月臀位产时计划剖宫产与计划阴道分娩的比较:一项随机多中心试验。足月臀位产试验协作组。
Lancet. 2000 Oct 21;356(9239):1375-83. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02840-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Contraindications in national guidelines for vaginal breech delivery at term: Comparison, consensus, and controversy.足月阴道臀位分娩国家指南中的禁忌证:比较、共识与争议
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Dec;103(12):2373-2380. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14947. Epub 2024 Aug 18.
2
Comparing forces on the fetal neck in breech delivery in lithotomy versus all-fours position: a simulation model.比较截石位与臀位膝胸卧位分娩时胎儿颈部受力:模拟模型。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Jul;308(1):91-99. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06671-5. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
3
Comparison of Apgar scores in breech presentations between vaginal and cesarean delivery.
臀位分娩中阴道分娩与剖宫产的阿氏评分比较。
Tzu Chi Med J. 2017 Jan-Mar;29(1):24-29. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_5_17.
4
Cardiotocography in breech versus vertex delivery: an examiner-blinded, cross-sectional nested case-control study.臀位与头位分娩的胎心监护:一项检查者盲法的横断面巢式病例对照研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Oct 21;16(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1115-5.
5
Outcome of breech deliveries in cameroonian nulliparous women.喀麦隆未生育女性臀位分娩的结局
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2012 Oct;62(5):531-5. doi: 10.1007/s13224-012-0201-5. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
6
Breech presentation: a retrospective analysis of 12-years' experience at a single center.臀位分娩:单中心12年经验的回顾性分析
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2009;121(5-6):209-15. doi: 10.1007/s00508-009-1138-2.