Suppr超能文献

使用丙泊酚、美索比妥和七氟醚,比较呼吸模式与其他麻醉诱导措施。

Comparison of pattern of breathing with other measures of induction of anaesthesia, using propofol, methohexital, and sevoflurane.

作者信息

Strickland T L, Drummond G B

机构信息

Department of Anaesthetics, Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2001 May;86(5):639-44. doi: 10.1093/bja/86.5.639.

Abstract

We assessed change of the pattern of breathing as a marker of induction of anaesthesia, using a method of maintaining spontaneous breathing throughout the induction period. We compared this index with a measure used clinically, the lash reflex, and measures used for drug investigations such as loss of grip of an object, cessation of finger tapping, and loss of arm tone. Ninety female patients (mean age 32 (17-63) yr, mean weight 63 (10) kg) were randomly allocated to induction of anaesthesia using propofol, methohexital, or sevoflurane. The i.v. agents were given by slow injection estimated to give an induction dose (for weight drop end point) in 90 s. Sevoflurane was given by progressively increasing the inhaled concentration to 8% so that induction should occur within 90-120 s. We measured time to change in breathing pattern, loss of voluntary finger tapping, loss of the lash reflex (tested at 15 s intervals), loss of postural tone in an outstretched arm, and loss of grip of a small metal cylinder held between finger and thumb. For methohexital and sevoflurane, the mean times for induction of anaesthesia occurred in the above order. With propofol, the lash reflex and tone were lost at the same time. The mean (SD) time to induction, by loss of arm tone was 64 (16) s for propofol, 83 (23) s for methohexital, and 94 (31) s for sevoflurane. The mean time to change in breathing pattern was 47 (20) s for propofol, 53 (14) s for methohexital, and 78 (29) s for sevoflurane. Although the time to achieve each end point was different, all the end points (except the lash reflex) appeared to provide similar measures of induction of anaesthesia. The pattern of breathing is an early sign of the onset of anaesthesia.

摘要

我们采用一种在整个诱导期维持自主呼吸的方法,评估呼吸模式的变化作为麻醉诱导的标志。我们将该指标与临床上使用的一种指标——睫毛反射,以及药物研究中使用的指标,如抓握物体能力丧失、停止手指轻敲和手臂肌张力丧失进行了比较。90名女性患者(平均年龄32(17 - 63)岁,平均体重63(10)kg)被随机分配接受丙泊酚、甲己炔巴比妥或七氟醚麻醉诱导。静脉用药通过缓慢注射给药,估计在90秒内给予诱导剂量(以体重下降为终点)。七氟醚通过逐渐将吸入浓度增加到8%给药,以便在90 - 120秒内发生诱导。我们测量了呼吸模式改变的时间、自主手指轻敲能力丧失的时间、睫毛反射丧失的时间(每隔15秒测试一次)、伸直手臂时姿势肌张力丧失的时间以及食指和拇指间握住的小金属圆柱体抓握能力丧失的时间。对于甲己炔巴比妥和七氟醚,麻醉诱导的平均时间按上述顺序出现。使用丙泊酚时,睫毛反射和肌张力同时丧失。通过手臂肌张力丧失来衡量的平均(标准差)诱导时间丙泊酚为64(16)秒,甲己炔巴比妥为83(23)秒,七氟醚为94(31)秒。呼吸模式改变的平均时间丙泊酚为47(20)秒,甲己炔巴比妥为53(14)秒,七氟醚为78(29)秒。尽管达到每个终点的时间不同,但所有终点(除睫毛反射外)似乎都能提供相似的麻醉诱导衡量指标。呼吸模式是麻醉开始的早期迹象。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验