Vaugha D J, Thornton C, Wright D R, Fernandes J R, Robbins P, Doré C, Brunner M D
Department of Anaesthesia, Imperial College School of Anaesthesia at Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, UK.
Br J Anaesth. 2001 Jan;86(1):59-62. doi: 10.1093/bja/86.1.59.
Twenty-four patients were recruited and given either sevoflurane or desflurane as their sole anaesthetic. Each patient was given sequentially increasing or decreasing doses at 0.5 MAC intervals, and the median nerve somatosensory evoked response recorded after an equilibration at each concentration. The N20-P25 and P25-N35 amplitudes decreased with increasing agent concentration. However, for both agents the P15-N20 amplitude response was quadratic in shape. The peak inflection points were at 3.2% for sevoflurane and 4.9% for desflurane. There were no differences between the ascending and descending groups. This increase in activity in the midbrain at 'surgical' end-tidal anaesthetic concentrations suggests more complex neuroelectrical responses to anaesthesia than simple global suppression.
招募了24名患者,给予七氟醚或地氟醚作为唯一麻醉剂。每位患者以0.5MAC间隔依次给予递增或递减剂量,并在每种浓度平衡后记录正中神经体感诱发电位。N20-P25和P25-N35波幅随麻醉剂浓度增加而降低。然而,对于两种麻醉剂,P15-N20波幅反应呈二次曲线形状。七氟醚的峰值拐点在3.2%,地氟醚在4.9%。上升组和下降组之间没有差异。在“手术”呼气末麻醉浓度下中脑活动的这种增加表明,与简单的整体抑制相比,麻醉的神经电反应更为复杂。