• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种用于腋路臂丛神经阻滞的神经刺激技术的比较。

Comparison of two neurostimulation techniques for axillary brachial plexus blockade.

作者信息

Coventry D M, Barker K F, Thomson M

机构信息

Department of Anaesthetics, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2001 Jan;86(1):80-3. doi: 10.1093/bja/86.1.80.

DOI:10.1093/bja/86.1.80
PMID:11575415
Abstract

This prospective, randomized, double-blind study compared two techniques of axillary brachial plexus block using a peripheral nerve stimulator. Both groups received initial musculocutaneous nerve block followed by either a single injection on median nerve stimulation (group 1) or a double injection divided between median and radial nerves (group 2). All 60 patients received a total of 30 ml of lidocaine 15 mg/ml with epinephrine 5 microg/ml. Complete sensory blockade of all six peripheral nerves occurred in 53% and 97% of patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P<0.001), with a more rapid onset of blockade occurring in group 2 patients (P<0.001). Complete motor blockade was evident in 30% and 83% of patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P<0.001).

摘要

这项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究使用外周神经刺激器比较了两种腋路臂丛神经阻滞技术。两组均先进行肌皮神经阻滞,然后在正中神经刺激时,一组(第1组)单次注射,另一组(第2组)在正中神经和桡神经之间进行两次注射。所有60例患者均接受总量为30 ml的15 mg/ml利多卡因加5 μg/ml肾上腺素。第1组和第2组分别有53%和97%的患者实现了所有六条外周神经的完全感觉阻滞(P<0.001),第2组患者的阻滞起效更快(P<0.001)。第1组和第2组分别有30%和83%的患者出现明显的完全运动阻滞(P<0.001)。

相似文献

1
Comparison of two neurostimulation techniques for axillary brachial plexus blockade.两种用于腋路臂丛神经阻滞的神经刺激技术的比较。
Br J Anaesth. 2001 Jan;86(1):80-3. doi: 10.1093/bja/86.1.80.
2
An ultra-low dose of naloxone added to lidocaine or lidocaine-fentanyl mixture prolongs axillary brachial plexus blockade.在利多卡因或利多卡因-芬太尼混合液中添加超低剂量的纳洛酮可延长腋路臂丛神经阻滞时间。
Anesth Analg. 2009 Nov;109(5):1679-83. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181b9e904.
3
Efficacy of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block: a comparative study with nerve stimulator-guided method.超声引导下腋路臂丛神经阻滞的疗效:与神经刺激器引导法的对比研究
Chang Gung Med J. 2005 Jun;28(6):396-402.
4
Dexamethasone added to lidocaine prolongs axillary brachial plexus blockade.地塞米松与利多卡因合用可延长腋路臂丛神经阻滞时间。
Anesth Analg. 2006 Jan;102(1):263-7. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000189055.06729.0a.
5
A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blocks using 2 versus 4 injections.前瞻性、随机、双盲对比 2 针与 4 针注射在超声引导下腋路臂丛阻滞的效果。
Anesth Analg. 2010 Apr 1;110(4):1222-6. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181cb6791. Epub 2010 Feb 8.
6
Fentanyl improves analgesia but prolongs the onset of axillary brachial plexus block by peripheral mechanism.芬太尼可改善镇痛效果,但通过外周机制延长腋路臂丛神经阻滞的起效时间。
Anesth Analg. 2000 Aug;91(2):384-7. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200008000-00028.
7
Four-injection brachial plexus block using peripheral nerve stimulator: a comparison between axillary and humeral approaches.使用周围神经刺激器的四针臂丛神经阻滞:腋路与肱骨入路的比较
Anesth Analg. 2002 Oct;95(4):1075-9, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200210000-00053.
8
Block of the brachial plexus branches by the humeral route. A prospective study in 503 ambulatory patients. Proposal of a nerve-blocking sequence.经肱骨途径阻滞臂丛神经分支。对503例门诊患者的前瞻性研究。一种神经阻滞顺序的建议。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1999 Jul;43(6):609-13. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.1999.430603.x.
9
Ultrasound guidance improves success rate of axillary brachial plexus block.超声引导可提高腋路臂丛神经阻滞的成功率。
Can J Anaesth. 2007 Mar;54(3):176-82. doi: 10.1007/BF03022637.
10
Hemodynamic and blockade effects of high/low epinephrine doses during axillary brachial plexus blockade with lidocaine 1.5%: A randomized, double-blinded study.
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003 Sep-Oct;28(5):401-5. doi: 10.1016/s1098-7339(03)00225-6.

引用本文的文献

1
A randomised, non-inferiority study of chloroprocaine 2% and ropivacaine 0.75% in ultrasound-guided axillary block.一项氯普鲁卡因 2%和罗哌卡因 0.75%用于超声引导腋路阻滞的随机、非劣效性研究。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 11;11(1):10035. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89483-y.
2
Comparison Between the Two-Injection Technique and the Four-Injection Technique in Axillary Brachial Plexus Block with Articaine.阿替卡因用于腋路臂丛神经阻滞时两种注射技术(两次注射技术与四次注射技术)的比较
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2017 Oct;45(5):289-296. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2017.16023. Epub 2017 Oct 1.
3
THE EFFECT OF COMBINING AXILLARY BRACHIAL PLEXUS BLOCK WITH INTERSCALENE OR SUPRACLAVICULAR BLOCK FOR UPPER LIMB SURGERIES USING NEUROSTIMULATION TECHNIQUE.
神经刺激技术下腋路臂丛神经阻滞联合肌间沟或锁骨上阻滞在上肢手术中的效果
J West Afr Coll Surg. 2016 Apr-Jun;6(2):78-94.
4
Comparison of Nerve Stimulation-guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block, Single Injection versus Four Injections: A Prospective Randomized Double-blind Study.神经刺激引导下腋路臂丛神经阻滞单针注射与四针注射的比较:一项前瞻性随机双盲研究
Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Jan-Mar;11(1):140-143. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.186865.
5
Our experiences with a single injection axillary block technique.我们采用单次注射腋路阻滞技术的经验。
North Clin Istanb. 2014 Aug 3;1(1):39-44. doi: 10.14744/nci.2014.02996. eCollection 2014.
6
Single, double or multiple-injection techniques for non-ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block in adults undergoing surgery of the lower arm.在接受下臂手术的成人中,非超声引导下腋路臂丛神经阻滞的单次、两次或多次注射技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 2;9(9):CD003842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003842.pub5.
7
A randomized comparative study of efficacy of axillary and infraclavicular approaches for brachial plexus block for upper limb surgery using peripheral nerve stimulator.一项使用外周神经刺激器对上肢手术行腋路和锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞疗效的随机对照研究。
Indian J Anaesth. 2011 May;55(3):253-9. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.82670.
8
Axillary brachial plexus block.腋路臂丛神经阻滞
Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2011;2011:173796. doi: 10.1155/2011/173796. Epub 2011 May 22.
9
Comparision of nerve stimulator and ultrasonography as the techniques applied for brachial plexus anesthesia.神经刺激器与超声检查作为臂丛神经麻醉应用技术的比较。
Int Arch Med. 2011 Jan 21;4(1):4. doi: 10.1186/1755-7682-4-4.