Suppr超能文献

两种用于腋路臂丛神经阻滞的神经刺激技术的比较。

Comparison of two neurostimulation techniques for axillary brachial plexus blockade.

作者信息

Coventry D M, Barker K F, Thomson M

机构信息

Department of Anaesthetics, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2001 Jan;86(1):80-3. doi: 10.1093/bja/86.1.80.

Abstract

This prospective, randomized, double-blind study compared two techniques of axillary brachial plexus block using a peripheral nerve stimulator. Both groups received initial musculocutaneous nerve block followed by either a single injection on median nerve stimulation (group 1) or a double injection divided between median and radial nerves (group 2). All 60 patients received a total of 30 ml of lidocaine 15 mg/ml with epinephrine 5 microg/ml. Complete sensory blockade of all six peripheral nerves occurred in 53% and 97% of patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P<0.001), with a more rapid onset of blockade occurring in group 2 patients (P<0.001). Complete motor blockade was evident in 30% and 83% of patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P<0.001).

摘要

这项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究使用外周神经刺激器比较了两种腋路臂丛神经阻滞技术。两组均先进行肌皮神经阻滞,然后在正中神经刺激时,一组(第1组)单次注射,另一组(第2组)在正中神经和桡神经之间进行两次注射。所有60例患者均接受总量为30 ml的15 mg/ml利多卡因加5 μg/ml肾上腺素。第1组和第2组分别有53%和97%的患者实现了所有六条外周神经的完全感觉阻滞(P<0.001),第2组患者的阻滞起效更快(P<0.001)。第1组和第2组分别有30%和83%的患者出现明显的完全运动阻滞(P<0.001)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验