Berenson A B, Radecki C M, Grady J J, Rickert V I, Thomas A
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555-0587, USA.
Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Oct;98(4):576-82. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01495-8.
To compare the effect of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) and two types of oral contraceptives (OC) on bone mineral density (BMD) among women 18-33 years of age with those not using hormonal contraception.
Data from 155 women were analyzed. Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate was administered to 33 women; 63 women who chose oral contraception were randomly assigned to receive either a norethindrone-containing pill (n = 28) or a desogestrel-containing pill (n = 35). Fifty-nine women who did not use hormonal contraception served as controls. Lumbar spine BMD was determined using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at baseline and after 12 months of contraceptive use. We analyzed method-related percent change in BMD while controlling for body mass index, calcium intake, exercise, and smoking. We had approximately 90% power to detect a 2.5% difference between any two groups.
Users of DMPA experienced a mean BMD loss of 2.74% over 12 months compared with controls who sustained a 0.37% loss (P = .01). Users of OCs generally demonstrated a gain (2.33% for norethindrone-containing pills, 0.33% for desogestrel-containing pills), which was different from controls among users of norethindrone-containing pills (P = .01), but not among users of desogestrel-containing pills (P = .99). Observed changes in BMD among DMPA users differed from women who used either type of pill (P < .002).
Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate has an adverse effect on BMD, in comparison with OCs or nonhormonal methods, when used for 12 months. Results must be interpreted cautiously until it is determined whether these effects endure or are reversible.
比较醋酸甲羟孕酮长效避孕针(DMPA)和两种口服避孕药(OC)对18 - 33岁未使用激素避孕的女性骨密度(BMD)的影响。
分析了155名女性的数据。33名女性接受醋酸甲羟孕酮长效避孕针治疗;63名选择口服避孕药的女性被随机分配接受含炔诺酮片(n = 28)或含去氧孕烯片(n = 35)。59名未使用激素避孕的女性作为对照。在基线和使用避孕药12个月后,使用双能X线吸收法测定腰椎骨密度。我们在控制体重指数、钙摄入量、运动和吸烟的同时,分析了与方法相关的骨密度百分比变化。我们有大约90%的把握检测出任意两组之间2.5%的差异。
与骨密度损失0.37%的对照组相比,使用醋酸甲羟孕酮长效避孕针的女性在12个月内骨密度平均损失2.74%(P = 0.01)。口服避孕药使用者通常骨密度增加(含炔诺酮片者增加2.33%,含去氧孕烯片者增加0.33%),含炔诺酮片使用者与对照组相比有差异(P = 0.01),但含去氧孕烯片使用者与对照组无差异(P = 0.99)。醋酸甲羟孕酮长效避孕针使用者观察到的骨密度变化与使用任何一种口服避孕药的女性不同(P < 0.002)。
与口服避孕药或非激素方法相比,醋酸甲羟孕酮长效避孕针使用12个月对骨密度有不良影响。在确定这些影响是持久的还是可逆的之前,结果必须谨慎解读。